Message from @Vannevariable
Discord ID: 528561580527452175
Feelings never trump reality. Feeling that water isn't wet and you don't need to hold your breath doesn't mean you will be dry and not drown.
i think far right and far left are similiar in a way they are both extremes of an idea and it foes into chaos when it is implemented
Bingo.
Nazis are far left.
Far right is ancapistan.
but wasn hitler on the right wing of politics? and he created nazis the nazi germany
commies are far left, nazi is far right
Yeah
I'm center right myself
Hitler was a Marxist.
but nazis are white identarians
Hm
or something like that (difficult word)
Aryan supremacists
yeah so they were far left
Fair enough... so where's the far right?
Corporate autocracy?
there wasnt a far right ideology tried yet 😅 if Hitler was left
Corporatism is the PC word for fascism.
So mussolini maybe?
Far right is ancap. Centrist would be ayn rand and hayek n shit.
what is far right ideology? would like to know cus i am getting lost in this thing
More later. Break's over
Rothbard and Hoppe are far right.
:(
Individualist anarchism is far right.
An advocate of a private law society is far right.
so basicly no govermenr and survival of the strongest?
like everyone is on their own
Not no government, just not monopoly on government.
Privatize everything.
soo if i got it right there would be a lot of governments in a country?
or dafuq xD cus rigth now there is monopoly on government in every country cus it is only one government
Ron Paul is pretty much far right.
okay so no government at all I think that is more understandable to have a one world as a place to live if all governments fall than having one world congress/government which would be corupt from inside out
For clarity, the definition of "state" that ancaps mean is:
*>A state is a compulsory political organization with a centralized government that maintains a monopoly on the legitimate use of force within a certain geographical territory.*
(From wikipedia)
soo state is even a local organized group with a leader and set of rules?
in a poor man reasoning
https://mises.org/wire/feudalism-system-private-law
*>Critics of anarcho-capitalism often wrongly assume that the absence of a state would mean the absence of civil government, but serious proponents of anarchism have never claimed that civil government can or should disappear. Opponents of the state merely assert that a civil government that relies on a monopoly on coercion is illegitimate. This is of course different from asserting that all types of civil government are illegitimate.*