thats an oxymoron

define science

me?

oh well

@jeremy that is science. but do you participate in those science activities?

oh

im sorry, that takes away alot of credit from you @jeremy

yes

its perfectly fine to deny current models of science. thats how science evolves. but you need to have a better model that has been backed up over and over and over again

you need a better model if you're trying to completely disregard the current one

yea

everything has "flaws"

nothing is perfect, right ?

how

did you watch the ISS vid i sent @jeremy

and yeah

prove it

yes

prove it

back it up

gravity

if the container was the size of the earth, then you'd see the same effect

trees make more air btw

nah, make a planet sized "container" and you'll see how gravity works

no

its possible

why

i know the shape

you dont

you wouldnt believe me if i did it

if i did it, you'd deny it. thats why you have to do it yourself

i have tons and tons of proof. its just a matter of what sources you choose to give credit too. which is entirely subjective @rivenator12113

hes right

jupiter is nothing but a gas container

you wont believe it

most giant planets are just gas balls

no its not @jeremy

idc whether they are or not

they just are

why would that effect my life lol

i mean that its not a "belief"

its not a belief

its someone else's discovery

jupiter "is" the container

lolol

@jeremy so does yours

thats not proof

nor fact

prove it is a fact @jeremy

please

huh

thats not what i asked

yes

how

you ask me to prove things

i'd accept an equation as proof 🙂

yes

i am

the way you word it though

i'd phrase it differently

that a fallacy you're asking

please

lol

true. but trees make more oxygen constantly

they dont?

it was nice knowing you @Wendigo

no

it is reproducible

^^^^^

one that goes 80,000 + feet

@jeremy you sure do like proof alot, to say you're a guy with no proof

@jeremy what would you do if the top FE youtuber's came out as globers and said that they were just in it for views and money, would you still believe in FE? Hypothetically ofc

I ask you the same question @The Gwench anyone willing to answer really

Who’s this Nathan guy people keep mentioning

<#547645432604393482> Companies are working on turning carbon emissions into reusable energy as we speak. They’re expensive to build and we would need ALOT of them

@The Gwench I adapt the question for you. Your sources. Who ever they are, if they “came out the FE closet”, would you challenge your beliefs/observations?

I’m asking if you would. Not implying

I got my answer

My bad. It wasn’t a targeted or personal question. I invited anyone to answer

I’m asking because if the sources I go to changed their positions on things, I would question it and mines as well @The Gwench I’m curious to see how others think. That’s why I’m here

Trees make more air as well, alway refilling the atmosphere, because air does slowly leak away into the vacuum, it’s just doesn’t happen suddenly

Yes

I can’t

Maybe someone doesn’t sneak into your house at night

How much air pressure would you say our atmosphere has @jeremy

were you answering me?

@California Nightmare 2.0 thats the new forefront of physics at the moment. it hasn't matured much into a field of study yet

relative density ?

im aware of density

things work differently in a vacuum

up, down, left, right doesnt exist

yes !

yes

"float"

what

"For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction"

things do nothing in space until something else interacts with it

there is no air in space

nothing to be relative to

DM @Wendigo for further inquiry