Some lefties thought this mug was a good response to DJT. Figured I'd add a bit to it to clarify.

@PatriotTxMomSuzyQ any more information on that particular passing?

would be good to keep a watchful eye on that one. Being its Michigan and with all the other "Deaths" springing up lately...

Was he on any special councel or investigative team?

the name is snaping at the back of my mind. He was an important player somewhere but having difficulty triggering my landmarks on him.

oh intresting. Detroit.

hrm.... one of the congressmen pushing the war on Police with the "Excessive Force" narrative.

curiouser and curiouser......

I think I found what I was remembering about him. He was pushing a bill to protect special councels. back in 2017.

"If the special counsel is removed, the legislation allows the special counsel to challenge the removal in court, which would be heard and determined by a panel of 3 federal judges within 14 days of the filing of the action. The panel of judges would determine whether or not there was good cause for the removal of the special counsel. In the event that the panel of judges finds there was no good cause for the removal, the individual would be immediately reinstated as special counsel."

so basically he was putting up a roadblock to try and protect the Mueller investigation. Not like it mattered but still. Think it was a reactionary panic driven response to calls for the POTUS to fire Mueller.

Because this roadblock was actually more a free pass for the President to kick them out. as Indicated by the Other provisions of the Special Counsel Integrity Act:"Codifies existing Department of Justice regulations that a special counsel appointed by the department ***may only be removed*** for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or other good cause, like a violation of departmental policies. The Department of Justice must inform the special counsel in writing as to the reason for their removal."

something something ***Conflict of intrest*** something something ***Violation of departmental policies*** something something cough cough***FISA*** cough cough.

and heya Shai'enne

@RetiredTchr

Actually Kazzoo there is something stoping you from making those false claims. In a traditional court of law Bearing False Witness is a crime. We are not dealing with "Traditional Courts" as of now but Kangaroo courts and star chambers. The panic is real and these people are not following the law, blatantly breaking all laws and predicates and not batting an eye. They are running scared and trying to get out of the way of a train. Problem is they just entered a tunnel. There is no escape. The outcome is clear at this point. Only a matter of time. Law is slow for a reason. And this case is massive. No case in history has been as large or all encompasing.

^^^Timestamp 0:38. Thats why I remember him.

....They are trying that now. Its all over the media

specifically the "Inteligence Agents". McCabe, Comey, Brennan and Clapper.

I doubt they would turn to Jesus at this point. They are corrupted body mind and soul. These were major players of this whole group. Those who scream the loudest are the only ones we will hear. The minor players have already sung in secret to the investigators.

At this point it boils down to finger pointing.

And it wont matter. We have it all.

keep in mind this investigation has been ongoing since Jeff Sessions was in play.

no it was a non issue to cry about. A feint.

by law he was not able to discuss an active investigation. So he didn't have to do anything on the surface. It was an active investigation. Jeff was also the one who appointed Durham and the others as well.

No hes not deep state.

The investigation was of those who were investigating.

They were not looking into "Russia" It was Ukraine.

and others

Canary traps are quite effective when they are not spoiled.

It was kept quite because agents of Schiff were not allowed into the investigation. It became clear early on who the main leaker was. Adam Schiff. Finding agents of his was what the majority of the Canary traps were for.

Military Planning. This has been planned out and wargamed by some of the greatest tactical minds in the business. Even had Trump lost there were plans to take out whoever ended up in the whitehouse.

No that was the optics of it. We are watching a show. Think laser pointer and cats. Compare that to how the democrats are reacting now. They are almost directionless at this point. Chasing down shadows that are not there.

Always

There were cookies?

no there was parrallel investigations going on. The Show trial of the dems and the actual investigation in the background.

the actual investigation was being done by our side but they needed to make sure that it was a trustworthy group dedicated to the rule of law and not zealously anti Trump. That was what Sessions was working on. "Clearing the way" as it were

indeed but again it was not that lines were not crossed. Its that specific "Truths" were allowed to leak. Thats what a canary trap is. Tell many suspected spies a story. Change minor things in the story. See what comes out.

each spy gets a unique story

If they were to use the brute force of the military it would bring cause for a Warcry. It would instigate a civil war. Done this way it opens the eyes of the sleepers to see what is going on and has been for decades. To get the sleepers on our side is the ultimate goal. If the few who refuse at the end of this continue to seek war well so be it. But there will be far fewer to deal with and easier to maintain and get help for.

Indeed. But that was one of the possible outcomes that had been discused had Trump not won. It would have been a bloody war.

yeah np

no I mean if Hillary had won she would not have gotten very far. There were plans to take her or any of the other shills out. Trump won thankfully.

It wont

They don't have the power to do anything. They are being allowed to do their show trials because it only further incriminates them. Its waking up the people.

They are panicking because they know what Trump and his team have. They are acting because they do not think he will pull the trigger on the information hes got. He showed them he was more than capable of doing just that with the Transcript. It destroyed their narrative completely. And that was akin to a cork pop gun in terms of damage.

compared to the other information they have

Yeah because they are trying to foment anger and start a civil war.

They want to have "Right Wingers" attack them so they can call it credible response. But they are not getting the answer they seek. The wind up toys are basically running around without a goal. But they do not know where to go with it.

Exactly. Thats why that has failed. People see them for what they are.

At this point any response to them is seen as credible self defense on the part of the attacked not the antifa wind up toy.

Yeah its regional. Democrat run towns. Portland is one of their main strongholds but its not that large outside of that place.

yeah. He will be delt with eventually for sure. But there are many factors at play right now.

When is he up for reelection?

might be worth looking in to. I'm going to guess its coming up soon. In which case it would be "Vote him out" to avoid a violent response. Not really sure but given some other responses around the nation such as in Austin Texas it might be they are waiting for that to hopefully get him out legitimatly.

rather than what is going on in Austin. "Do your job or we will do it for you".

yeah there are several cities and some states that are doing really stupid stuff. It will take a long while to clean them up but they are the origin of our current corruption we are dealing with. Caifornia is the prime example of this

yeah its a stupid concept driven by stupid democrats.

not addressing the problems they are creating but creating more confusion to the problems

no but with the garbage in the food it is causing mental derangement. Add to this the confusing retoric and you get 52 "Genders". Biology called. They want to become relevent and respected again.

yeah its been going around a long while

@Jackie Trying to look through us code to see what would give them potential to claim that. All I am seeing would be something in "U.S. Code CHAPTER 8—FOREIGN SERVICE BUILDINGS" If the building was rented by the state. still searching though.

trying to rebrand our words to fit their narrative. It wont work. The Left can't meme for a reason

also deb that article about the aid. **"Ethawi gave valuable information which helped the Iraqi multi-security agencies team complete the missing pieces of the puzzle of Baghdadi's movements and places he used to hide," one of the Iraqi security officials said.** Makes me wonder what else was told to them....Would he have been needed after the information was aquired? 🤔

@radium88h I'm not sure what statute they are abusing to do that myself. I was looking through US legal code yesterday.....They could have been allowed to rent space in a federal building but not sure what gave em the right to have a full blown compound. Many problems in the US code with that. Not that dems care about law anymore though

also looking through the comments on it I was right. They can rent space but are not given jurisdiction over said space. It is not an embacy/consulate. It is still US land. that means Governed by US law.

@AnonMoeJo

@AnonMoeJo I think this one might work even better. Salt in the wound as it were.