The change in the rocket piece.

Idk.

Lmao.

He got jailbaited by Human Sheeple.

Hm?

Far as what?

It's always a bad time to join.

Unless you aren't a troll.

Both.

Rice pudding.

You are into lying flavor? @criticallyred

Sounds about right for a brainwashed person.

Why wouldn't you be able to see them?

Another brained washed globe earther.

You should think for yourself sometime, it's really healthy.

Denies? You mean revokes?

Depends on the argument.

I, as in me, don't have answers/arguments to everything the the globe earth has to offer.

That's just honesty.

However

I do have proof for certain things to disprove the globe earth objectively.

Because it doesn't line up with reality.

No measurable curve for example.

Even the best scientists can't decide on what height you can see the curve.

At what height can you see the curve of the earth?

Both.

What height?

20 miles?

20 miles up?

20 miles up?

You can see the curve?

Aw, you don't even know your own model.

You can't see the curve at 20 miles.

What's that in miles? I don't do feet.

Mhm.

6.6 miles @bob.

If you can't see it at 20 miles how would you see it at 6 miles??

Get your curve math together and come back later.

Show me a picture, that doesn't use fish eye lens, at 20 miles.

Send proof.

A specific video. @The Big Gambino

I've seen most of those videos and they don't show curvature and a few of those use fish eye lens as well.

Give me a specific video.

You say there is curve when there isn't any.

@The Big Gambino Where does it say they don't use fish eye lens?

They don't? Next.

You can tell they are using it by using a simple chart of fish eye lens.

Which ones?

The playlist?

🤦

Loaded question.

Ask one at a time. @bob.

I'll take a question at a time.

@The Big Gambino I can show you a picture that prove they could work on either model.

@bob. What's galileo experiment again?

What a mocker.

They would fit closer.

The NASA shills want you believe they are millions of miles away.

Planets < Stars

They are obviously stars Tyler.

Dim stars probably but stars none the less.

What?

The stars?

Lmao.

The planets have seasons?

Prove it.

Then prove it right now.

Go ahead.

@bob. The rover experienced the NASA ban hammers.

You clearly don't know where the rover actually was.

And @Tyler, sorry to disappoint you but when I said prove it I meant without NASA sources which are linked all over that Wikipedia page.

That's incorrect as well, you are wrong once again. @bob.

I don't care what you are.

You are still wrong.

<:happy:507991686320750592>

It is.

At least from what NASA says.

It's on their photos of "the real Mars".

Obviously no one knows what Mars actually is cause no one has been there and no one will ever be there.

Am I american?

NASA isn't the only one lying.

I wonder why Tyler.

Lmao.

Sure bub, whatever you say.

Hell if I know.

I want to know the same thing.

There are many reasons for them doingi t.

I don't have to explain if the argument is dumb? @criticallyred

It's late and I need to sleep.

Enough globe earther logic for one day.