That is explicitly wrong

We know that instinctually

Genocide is mass killing

So yes, I think the average person would know it is immoral

Apparently you don’t

You argued for mass killing of communists

That is genocide by definition

Sounds like what the nazis said about the Jews

Also what the Nazis said about the Jews

You would make a very good hitler youth

AFFORDABLE HOUSING! NOOOO!

STOP THREATENING ME!

DON’T DO IT

Just because you targeted a different group than the Jews?

You picked another group and made them the enemy

I’m not even defending them

YOU WANT TO MURDER THEM

I am arguing against that

I don’t even need to defend them

I’m just pointing out that you are blatantly pro genocide

You are charging them with pre-emptive thought-crime and unilaterally sentencing them to death in a labor camp

That is literal genocide

“Must give way” ≠ “die”

That’s a stretch

I’m relying on what you thought he meant

And I take it you’re not a fan of Marx so

Zero bias at all

Totally neutral

It sounds like “must give way”

He also said classes not just races

And if you take that phrase in context

With the rest of Marx’s beliefs and writings

Which comprised mainly of ending stratification by social structure as well as race

“Must give way” means more literally -

Must give way

As in attempts to continue to separate humanity by class and race

Must end

Why is a hierarchical social structure considered ideal?

That’s not a foundation of anything

That’s a tower

The taller the tower, the shakier it becomes

I agree

People should not have their shit stolen

I’m not avoiding the question

What are you asking?

I fear your Christian god about as much as I fear pikkiwoki the mud god

Or Zeus

So judeo Christian hierarchies ending would be a nice thing indeed

They are arbitrary and based on faith

Rather than any humanist sense of morality

Hierarchy of sexes is common sense?

I’ve never felt the need to stand above a woman

How about no to both

God was made by man

By that logic he should pray to me

We invented gods

We invented gods when we did not have the real answers

And for some reason people still believe that idiocy

Trees are trees

This is stupid

I can’t believe I’m saying this but

I agree with Grim

and I’ll probably never say that again

At least I hope not

You should take that test

It’ll probably say national socialist too

I’m a libertarian socialist apparently

So make of that what you will

You also have some heavily nazistic tendencies @aceareux1!

We discussed your nazistic tendencies earlier

Your loose attitude towards genocide and your psychology surrounding it

For starters

Nazis didn’t just target people racially

They went after socialists as well

Nazis went after reds, they were enemies in war though so you could theoretically argue that it was a military decision

But it was beyond that

If it wasn’t for the war they’d kill communists anyway

“Genocide of X group is OK as long as I don’t like X group”

For gods sake I’m not arguing for or against communism here

I’m just arguing against @aceareux1!

But you trust the government to administer death to people you don’t like

I think you’re misinterpreting what your family members say

Again, you’re a secondary source so who knows

I’m ideologically close to a democratic socialist and I debated you all damn night

Want to go for round 2?

Sounds like you don’t want another verbal evisceration

I don’t blame you

Well I’ll be here if you need me

I’ll present the necessary condemnatory opprobrium because the guys on the right here certainly won’t

Exactly. That’s why when the term socialist gets thrown around as a scare term it’s ridiculous

Socialist seems to mean different things to different people

It makes it an almost useless label

How have democrats incentivized single parent households?

“Of course women do not get pregnant just to get welfare benefits.... But, by removing the economic consequences of out-of-wedlock birth, welfare has removed a major incentive to avoid such pregnancies. A teenager looking around at her friends and neighbors is liable to see several who have given birth out-of- wedlock. When she sees that they have suffered few visible consequences ... she is less inclined to modify her own behavior to prevent pregnancy.... Current welfare policies seem to be designed with an appalling lack of concern for their impact on out-of-wedlock births. Indeed, Medicaid programs in 11 states actually provide infertility treatments to single women on welfare.”

I think this sums it up

Democrats didn’t incentivize single parent households

You want them to explicitly *disincentivize* it

You want there to be “consequences” for an out of wedlock birth

Beyond the natural consequences

You want to create an unfeasible economic situation for the single parent