It's an example.

There can be no other context for this belief other than what led to it.

Exactly.

Mate

Racist humor, while distasteful and should be discouraged, is not racism.

mate

I never tried to attack your jokes.

Literally nothing I've said contradicts what you are saying.

You are trying to excuse racism.

A racist joke is a clear sign of racism but isn't proof of racism in itself.

Oh please

That is just an excuse.

"Hehehehe blacks right"

Is clearly sign of racism.

A racist joke is a sign of racism but isn't definitive proof of it.

If your humor relies on poor-taste jokes, you need to fix that lol.

Mate

There was humor before racist jokes and there always will exist humor that isn't a racist, sexist, homophobic, or so on kind of joke.

Meh

Irrelevant

(Talking to Ben)

Whether or not I say math or maths is completely irrelevant lol.

Mate, I'm Alabaman. Guess.

Math is fun.

I don't really care.

I never even attacked racist jokes lol.

Surely if you believed that racist jokes aren't racism you wouldn't have quickly jumped to the conclusion that was what I meant?

Before that.

When you immediately jumped on me for it.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/378603234757181442/446818110356586496/Liberals.PNG

I said nothing about racist jokes but that is what you assumed.

It can't be any other way mate.

WHAT CONTEXT!? The only context that can exist is the context that led to the belief itself!

That does not excuse the belief!

Let me say this right now mate

I wasn't attacking racist jokes.

I wasn't even thinking about racist jokes.

You brought out racist jokes before I even said that you fool.

You assumed this was relevant to racist jokes.

It

Was

Not

If you can tell me what I meant better than I can, I surely must not.

Congrats mate, a sexist joke made to be petty.

I was mostly ranting about "Marxists" who hang around with Fascists pretending there is some middle ground by wasting their time discussing it with them.

>Tells someone to go make a sandwich for someone
>Totally not a sexist joke

Excuse my doubt.

I honestly should not have expected better from Liberals.

Continue using that word, I don't think it means what you think it does.

Context, in this situation, is that we were discussing racist and sexist jokes. You left making a "go make someone a sandwich" joke.

A petty sexist joke made to spite the "debate".

I was ranting about racism and Elbow jumped to defend his precious racist jokes despite them not even being relevant to the conversation.

Cool

I can judge him easily by the fact he felt defensive where he didn't need to be.

*This is what Liberals actually believe*

*Oh god*

Mate

My guy

You scream about context but you ignore what that phrase's history is.

It is used to demean women and their struggle.

*I'm going to die if they start defending prostitution*

Mate

The context was a discussion about racist and sexist jokes.

I'm sure the South African Trump supporter is generally positive on Nelson Mandela.

Violence is the positive execution. Imagine if the Indians were not fighting on the streets for results, Indian independence would have happened later.

Or never.

Or when the Soviets called for decolonization.

You can guess I'm very anti-Gandhi.

*Let's starve ourselves. THAT WILL GET THE BRITISH TO STOP! Let us ignore they didn't care the last famine.*

*Oh and you can do violence on your own. I'll just preach non-violence and take nearly full credit when your struggle gains India its independence.*

*Oh and I hate that Indians are placed on the same level as Africans. We are obviously superior and to be placed on such a level is distasteful.*

Gandhi basically.

If he was honest, he was an idiot. If he wasn't honest, he was good.

If he wasn't honest, at least he wasn't as big a lying and disgusting snake as the Dalai Lama.

When a feudal lord who had people sacrificed to him when he was the head of state of Tibet is the sign of Tibetan liberation.

Trust me.

Tibetans would long choose China over that douche.

*Of course no one wants to consider the opinions of Tibetans in these questions.*

This man *owned slaves*.

**OWNED**

I have beef with a man who owned slaves, had people sacrificed to him, and led a theocratic feudal state dominated by warlords being the symbol for the liberation of a nation.

>Defends Capitalism
>Commies

They're convenient.

>When the most Bourgeois state in the union is suddenly Communist.

"dems r closeted communists"

*Laughs in having actually read writings from actual Communists.*

Daily reminder Dems and Repubs are the exact same shit with different faces. It's both Liberalism.

It's an annoying role.

It's fine.

I wasn't complaining.

And?

*When the Trump-supporters pretend they aren't Liberals.*

Same shit

The same defenders of "Liberty". They are no longer progressive or radical. It is Capitalist as hell.

The difference between Liberal sects is pointless discussion. It leads to the same crap.

Individualism/

It is individualist.

Individualism, bourgeois "freedom", and Capitalism are the primary similarities of all Liberal sects.

But they believe the same key things.

Individualism, bourgeois "freedom", and Capitalism.

Pretty much all centrists are Liberals.