What I said is indeed a fact @leftist npc man

You say that while also being on the side of the people who where the KKK

yes I do know

I also knwo that the KKK is also still the same people there where when they began

also known as democrats

If I was a part of a group that everyone hated and I knew everyone hated us and I hated Trump wouldn't it be more damageing to say I love trump then to say I hate him?

oh wait you didnt think of that did you....

not tacticly

which is why 90% of them voted democrat yes?

no

its called seaching me files

because I cant RECALL EVERYTHIGN THAT HAPPEND off the top of my head

am I not wrong?

is that no a tactic that can be used?

tell me

tell me

is that a tactic that can be used

not would

can

can it

not in this case and woudl are the same thing

can it be used was the question

it 100% cant be used

are yo usure

then yoru a idiot.

I not askign that am i?

I can can it

not would it

It is a tactic

it can be used like i said

therefore

you cnat deny it

regressive*

and yet....

they said yes to trump

so then

what would be the point

if

they knew they where hated

and knew thet endorceing trump would cause harm

so then wouldnt it be better to not say anything

Like the SJW's antifa and the liberals yes?

oh?

and the liberals have beaten that many

killed

beaten

all in the hate of trump

never said that

I said beaten and some killed

and beten AND killed

as in

2 sepreate things

have you turned on the news recently at all?

the people who keep being beaten say other wise

heres one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQmbn7ndvZQ

the 140,000 videos of things liek that jsut poped up is a stat but one moment and I ll find oyu a real stat

if all of them are phone recording of liberasl beatign republicans it is

so then tell me....

you say you want stats right? and you know for 100% sure that your right and the killings and beatign(mostly beatings) do not occure on the regularity i mtalking about yes?

so then....

hwo do you know they arnt?

simply because they are not brought up or?

but what if then

the person that say there is no legos in the box

are telling everyone else there are no legos in the box but you need to take that box away from that person because it might have legos in it. By force.

the people who say there are legos in the box say they have seen the legos because they have opened the box. But the people who say there are no legos have not looked in the box and call the people who say there are legos in the box liars. Now the people who say there are no legos call the leader of the people who say there are legos in the box (lets call him jim) a liar and say he is spreading lies about the box. The people who say there are legos in the box say no he isnt lieing about the legos because they to have seen the legos. But the people who say there are no legos in the box call the people who say there are legos in the box liars to and say they need to be punished for lieing about the box. The people who say there are legos in the box say callign them a liar because of somethign they themselves have not looked into is wrong and they shoudl change their way of thinking and look for themselves. But the people who believe there are no legos in the box say that the people who say there are legos in the box are being racist against them because they said they dont know what is in the box and therefore from their view point are calling themselves smarter then them.

So the people who believe there are no legos in the box call the others nazis and shout for violence agaisnt them because Jim has said that there are legos in the box and he somehow won the fight to be leader of the 2 peoples. So the people who say there are no legos in the box riot against Jim and the people who are with him. In the spratic riots people are hurt(some badly) by the people who believe that there are no legos in the box because the leaders of the people who believe there are no legos in the box said that that Jim and his followers said there are legos in the box and are lieing to everyone and calling the people that believe there are no legos in the box to be less then them because they said they are wrong. and so we arrive at today.... the people who believe there are no legos in the box call for violence agaisn the people who say there are legos in the box. https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/maxine-waters-political-violence/ https://www.huffingtonpost.com/jesse-benn/sorry-liberals-a-violent-_b_10316186.html

I give you the how many times we can type "people who believe there are (not) legos in the box" simulater...... I should of copy pasted... woudl of been less time.

lol

do you think I summed it up genrally?

it its meh work but it was a spur of the moment thing.

there is where the lego part is

LiberalFascistToday at 7:43 PM
Because I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that they are.
JJP007 (MEME WIZARD)Today at 7:43 PM
simply because they are not brought up or?
LiberalFascistToday at 7:43 PM
Yes, that is logical.
If I give you a box, and say it is full of lego. Yet there is no evidence to say that that box is full of lego, Then it is logical for you to assume that there is no lego in that box.
If there is no evidence for something it is probably not true

K g2g for a bit... see you in a while

lol

well

they do hold everything together now dont they?

the Lego movie says otherwise

well I mean

they wernt wrong in their world it would be

in the lego world it does

its literaly make of legos. thats why its called the lego world

Legos(like politics) can be both broken and assembled. But it is why they are broken and assembled that is the diffrence between the 2 sides of the political parties.

that what this conversation started at is it not?

but ill I ajsut it to not be abotu politics 1 moment

Legos(like people) can be both broken apart and assembled. But it is why they are broken and assembled that is the difference between the decietful and the careing.

I go mostly for facts only

so peopel yell at me a lot on the itnernet

mostly about my typeign abliity(or lack there of)

because apprently

bad typing = your utterly retarded and dont know what your talking about

as said to me by more then a few people.

its disheartening that people abandon their own argument in favor of attacking me on the grounds that my typeing is bad

ye

but then

when you point out that they abandoned their own argument in favor of attacking me on the grounds that my typeing is bad

they cuss you out

because reasons I guess

lol