Pigs, cows, and et cetera -- are not.

They were bred as livestock.

You can't compare killing dogs to killing pigs. That makes you look like a moron.

@IUisbae Correct

Yes, but that's besides the point

No

You are not paying attention

Those characteristics are merely effects of them being bred as pets

They were incontrovertibly bred as pets

Yes

That, and Asians also torture them

Both of those factors combined are proper reasons for why those who commit those acts must be shot.

Key word is 'suggested'

"It has been suggested" -- Asian propaganda

No, they weren't

You just took a theory and spun it into a fact

@IUisbae Just because 'other cultures have done it,' it's still not ethical

Asians aren't the only lunatics

That statement merely says that other cultures have eaten them

They have not been *BRED* for consumption

@IUisbae That is a pariah dog...

That is not the modern canine

And thus, it does not share relative genetics with modern dogs

What the fuck? When did I say that?

Yes?

When did I say it was okay to eat, then?

It's not unethical

But I don't think it's 'okay'

I wouldn't do it, and I wouldn't like others who do

Mainly because it's a wolf

...but it's still ethical, given that it is not a pet

Never thought I'd have to argue about the unethicality of eating dog.

But that's Asia for you.

It's pretty obvious for anyone who is civil.

'If you think about it.'

Yeah.

They're saying "it's not that unethical."

@IUisbae Are you talking about Asia, then?

Because Asian nations fit that description more than any others.

Yes

You are

Yes, and some countries are barbaric.

'Lack of any logic'

Want evidence? One word: 'Islam.'

So what

I'm not from India

If a nation's customs are shunned as barbaric and immoral by the rest of the world, they are. @IUisbae

Yes, the meat industry's methods are ethical.

It's shunned by every nation around it.

What are you talking about?

Also, some cultures are just barbaric. If you can't realize that, you might be one of them.

I beg to differ. It's objectively immoral to eat dogs.

Pigs and cows don't suffer.

We do not torture them.

They die painlessly.

How so?

We have methods of beheading and drugs that do not inflict pain upon the animal.

Because we, unlike Asian nations, are not barbaric in terms of torturing animals.

And even then, we don't kill pets.

I don't care what your opinion is on the matter -- eating dogs is immoral.

Sheep aren't pets, though

They weren't bred as loyal companions to man

I didn't ignore it

I said it didn't matter

They still didn't breed the dog

@IUisbae Then it's ethical, but not acceptable under my standards

And no it's not

No modern-day nation has bred a dog for consumption

No, they haven't

You gave me a theory which stated that they did -- but that is a THEORY

And as far as I'm concerned, it's Asian propaganda.

@IUisbae No, they don't

That article actually supports my claim

Dogs are domesticated as pets

Yes, and that domestication event was as pets

Not for consumption

You're just making shit up

They haven't eaten them for that long

You haven't stated any evidence

It is clear-cut

It is objectively immoral

That 'scientific evidence' merely states that Chinese have domesticated dogs.

It doesn't state that dogs were ever bred for consumption.

You are very stubborn about reading anything correctly. Every time I say something, you seem to not understand.

Long for what, one hundred years?

That's not enough time to breed a new subspecies of dog.

It's hardly enough time to create a new breed of dog.

Yeah, I don't believe that article in the slightest.

1. it's written by the Chinese.

2. it's not sourced whatsoever.

3. this claim is not repeated on any actual report on dog consumption.

Uh... yes I do?

The pure nature of the 'dog' and its history supports that evidence.

Don't even bring up Hawaii. We Americans try our best to ignore them.

Yes, we know that China was founded on barbarism.

Pretty sure they also ate their enemies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannibalism_in_China

China has a very long history of cannibalism.

@IUisbae Sure, but you're just driving away from the point.

The majority of this article focuses on a single person.