Raelis

Discord ID: 652163236229021726


245 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 2/3 | Next

Iโ€™m confused

Well idk

I guess Iโ€™m sub but like

Again I donโ€™t really know shit

Data is bad

Gimme a sec

The slave one intrigues me

I mean

I really have no idea what I like

And the thought of being degrading/degraded is weird to me

Canโ€™t do that without Justin and wonโ€™t do that for another year at least

Sorry I donโ€™t mess around lol

Fucking 99% tho lmao

I mean

I guess?

That ainโ€™t bad tho

Idk what he likes lmao

Not yet dummy

Thatโ€™s rude bruh

Oh no

I didnโ€™t read the first message and I thought you were serious

Yea me too

Missed that lmao

I saw a Vietnam Vet yesterday

He looks like Bill Cosby but not creepy

Nooooo thatโ€™s mean

Thomas what is yours

Yea I mean

Anyone right of center should be that

Anything else more specific tho

Cause thatโ€™s kinda bland tbh

Bruh sorry I ainโ€™t a whore and saving myself for my SO

Unlike men women canโ€™t bounce back from being a whore

Kinda my point too

Constitutionalism isnโ€™t really functional if this happened

I wonโ€™t open my mouth about this

All I have to say is that I think porn should get its own extension

And a better way to regulate that people using it are 18+

It makes men docile

And I donโ€™t think a full on ban is reasonable

I mean yea

I agree

Youโ€™re correct

The vehicles one tho

Because alcohol doesnโ€™t give you the ability to travel

Vehicles have a function

Over processing foods and drinking alcohol doesnโ€™t have the same kind of significance

You *can*

But you canโ€™t drink alcohol to help your job

And if you can

You need to re-evaluate

Travel is a modern day necessity

And you think thereโ€™s no alternative to that

Dude your argument isnโ€™t strong

Guess what

Time is money

Cars isnโ€™t a valid argument in this convo

This is about banning a recreation per se

Again

You *can*

But thatโ€™s not what it was made for

It was made for a faster more efficient form of travel

Which is functional

Porn isnโ€™t function

Alcohol isnโ€™t functional

What Iโ€™m getting from this debate is that youโ€™re a libertarian

Yes because I care about the well-being of the people

And I donโ€™t think people should be allowed to harm themselves

Why canโ€™t people sell their organs then

Or do coke

And heroin

Welcome to modern society because of those thoughts

Youโ€™d be an authority figure who is respectable because you care about the people you govern

Imagine not caring about the people who make up your country/state/etc.

Knowing how deviant people are, I donโ€™t have a solution to people breaking the rules, but for rules to be set in place, that at least shows that you care

I believe in paleoconservatism and authoritarianism

Because people do not have the mental capacity to properly govern themselves

They will choose too poorly for themselves and hurt themselves in the process

I can *say* whatever I want

Doesnโ€™t mean Iโ€™m the one executing it

If I found a viable model Iโ€™d propose it

But that takes time and knowledge in governing, neither of which I have

Turnip your big words are confusing me

My small, smooth, female brain canโ€™t comprehend

Because Iโ€™m having a hard enough time finding the terms to describe myself

245 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 2/3 | Next