you're right but the supreme court has upheld the establishment clause that we don't have a state religion and we can't have it

you can worship your religion

albeit christianity, islam, judaism, or buddhism

but if the government partakes in one of the many religions

it's gonna be christian and it's going to leave everyone else out

yes it can and it may overrule their own decisions with a different and more right leaning court

but it has upheld the establishment clause

multiple times

you're right it can be changed

but i have doubts that they will change it

sorry typo

you're right it can be changed

but my point is that the supreme court has upheld the establishment clause multiple times

and i doubt that they will try to change it

and in the case they do

it's going to be a protestant religion

and it's going to be a protestant christian denomination

because if we turn to catholicism, the pope will gain influence over the united states

and that's what we never wanted

i'm not so sure about orthodox

sounds great for christians but the consequences might be more than i think

perhaps the protestant churches will centralise but you need to realise that there are many inconsistencies between protestant religions based on interpretation

that can cause a rift

of course i see discrimination against other religious denominations

but my biggest worry is the ability for the science to advance with christianity

sometimes they have coexisted very well but many times they have not

my biggest worry is that the rise of christianity is the end to science

yes

if thats how you wish to interpret it

but

in the end, progression will suffer

the theory of evolution is well supported

i don't say it's true because science doesn't prove shit

but i think evolution is well supported so i support the theory of evolution

the state of utah?

the scopes trial really wasn't disproving the idea of creationism, it's challenging the Butler law which said that evolution must not be taught

though i do see the consequence of creationism disproven

the butler law is unconstitutional in my opinion because we do not have a state religion

and we shouldn't have a state religion

did they

jeff bezo's hair probably is worth more than you

and considering he's bald

"blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven"

matthew 7:5

"you hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the spec out of your brother's eye"

hot dogs are not sandwiches

hot dogs are attached on the bottom

it is not a sandwich

end of

because they have their own book and interpretations of the bible, correct?

hot take

sandwiches are tacos

sandwiches are tacos

but tacos are not sandwiches

just as all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares, all hot dogs are tacos but not all tacos are hot dogs

hot dogs are tacos

a hot dog bun

has one connection on the bottom

THEREFORE

it is a taco

taco

no

hot dogs are tacos

the bottom is connected

and so are taco shells

therefore

hot dogs are tacos

made of the same material

why the FUCK is the law defining what is a sandwich and what isnt

no

NY is pretty dumb in interpreting a sandwich

because

a taco

hot dogs are tacos

technically taco shells are made of tortillas and tortillas are made of bread SO TACO SHELL IS BREAD

it is a flatbread

i mean

its disgusting

but yes

it is a sandwich

checkmate, rightards

yes

LOL

similar shape, similar material, similar design

why would it not be

bread is bread

bruh

have you ever cooked like in your life

lol ok

i cook a lot

like a lot a lot

i cook mostly chinese and italian food

sometimes mexican

two types of people

what canned food do you eat

???

interesting

No because there will be a revolution at some point