so centre right economics, social libertarian?

@GoldenGail3 your tags make you look 10x worse than you are

yea

ursula von der leyen is the new EU commission head or something, but i've been looking into her background....

she was a doctor who somehow got elected in germany

and rose up to become the defence minister?

what the fuck does a physician know about geopolitics and the military?

*none* of her career was based in that side of politics

she was mostly involved in health and social issues

how does someone so seemingly inexperienced and unqualified get *appointed* as a defence minister of a major geopolitical power?

merkel's cabinet is incompetent if they appointed her....

i just dont understand their thinking process

who bullied you at school?

or was it your parents?

@robert from kinoplex listen to me on what?

theres nothing partisan in those comments i made lmao

how is questioning the qualifications of a defence minister a "left leaning" thing to do? isnt it just the "critical" thing to do?

is questioning the qualifications of a defense minister left leaning drivel? @robert from kinoplex

fucking give me image rights wtf

God-Emperor of MankindToday at 10:08 AM
@Green Syndicalism You left leaning parasite, you expect me to sit here and listen to you drive?

seems like you were talking about me lmao

i just want to know how a medical doctor is qualified to be a defense minister

your sentence construction is on another level

a lower level

i feel like im watching the devolution of language

so trump is hitler?

im hacking my phone

who cares

how is "people are idiots" something that justifies "pro-life" positions

it should be the converse

*because* people are idiots, we need the option for abortions

FrostBeast1Today at 3:01 PM
i was pro-choice for awhile before I realized that people are idiots

so family cant take care of kid -> *lets force the mother to go through months of agony only to give the baby away*

its a ridiculous position m8

its not a child

its a fetus

a baby isnt a fetus

barely

its "consciousness" is highly debatable

no and watching an abortion video wont change my mind

yes it does

we kill insects all the time

we kill animals willy nilly

fetuses arent much different

no it wouldnt lmao

thats like saying "maybe watching videos on animal slaughterhouses will change your mind"

so i went and watched videos on animal slaughter

and i loved it

thought it was metal af

how am i mentally ill for enjoying the slaughter of animals? thats literally how humans survived for 200k years

"how can you enjoy a process that kept your ancestors and you alive?"

no i dont

ive never watched a fetus get aborted so idk

it doesnt matter

the process doesnt bother me

so?

you supposed i was aborted

so what?

whats your point?

so?

if i got aborted, its because my parents were in such a tough position that my childhood wouldve been hell

so i wouldnt have been a happy typer in all likelihood

im not even a nihilist lmao

so middle class families dont want their budgets and lives squeezed? great decision. good on them

they can focus on their currently existing children

instead of rationing their efforts and money

so force mothers to go through 9 months of bullshit for a baby she wont even keep?

pretty dumb idea

thats why we need abortions daddy

people are irresponsible, so we need the abortive option

@Luis Eß bro a one time abortion payment is NOTHING compared to providing for a child

and its NOTHING compared to the agony of childbirth

its NOTHING compared to the disruption to your life

from having a massive bump and mood swings amongst the other bullshit that pregnancy brings

theres no such thing as a good pro-life argument lmao

these god arguments are so weak lmao

so referencing the known agonies of pregnancy is weak?

you mean referencing empirical reality is weak?

thats absurd

SolitudeToday at 3:22 PM
Not much of agony there is

this is fucking ridiculous

shows you know nothing about pregnancy

or childbirth for that matter

"im sure theres no hormonal or physical changes that induce agony when you have a whole baby developing inside of you!"

are you trying to regulate regrets?

what the fuck

let people fucking decide for themselves

"statistically speaking, 51% have regrets, so lets ban it!"

needs to be like 12-13 doesnt it

fetuses have the consciousness of an insect, yet i dont see you defending insect rights

do we ban alcohol because higher risk of liver disease?

do we ban maccas because higher risk of heart disease?

do we ban every single carcinogenic thing because of potential cancer risks?

no we dont

so its a weak argument

so what?

im not questioning its validity

im saying *just because there are cancer risks, doesnt mean we should ban it*

if we followed this logic, we would have to ban so much bullshit

it would be considered an authoritarian govt