@Sovnarkom Because theyre nazis and have a tendency to sperg out and act like toddlers

They have low attention spans

I'm transhumanist

I hope it gets run over @Shaggy Blanco

Most are for FALC

Literally me

Tfw they saw through my Jewish tricks

I'm a libertarian socialist, and I think that transhumanism, under socialism, would benefit and improve all humanity

Implying automation isn't already starting

That's why I'm a socialist dude

You're right that the outlook isn't good. But that doesn't change my views.

>Africans
Wut

Is there an African ruling class I didn't know about

Dude his name is Initial dues

He basically has pol written on his forehead
Anyway
I don't want any genocide, personally

We can hope that people will start to see capitalisms decay when their boss fires them and replaces them with a machine that works for free

Hold on I have a huge essay about this lemme get it

Well, it's not so much that overpopulation doesn't happen as it is that it's just a part of a much larger issue, which ought to be the focus. That issue is sustainability. Yes, having too large a population can be a threat to this sustainability, but humanity has encountered this issue frequently throughout its history and its response has always been to change the conditions and expand its territory to accommodate this growing population, not to start executing its citizens, killing off groups of people, or restricting their birthrates. I think we should continue this trend. We should look at overpopulation as just symptomatic of a lack of sustainability.

When we frame the issue as "we have too many people" rather than "we aren't sustainable", it can lead to violent and reactionary conclusions like genocides, """eugenics""" programs, restricting births, and the like. It also provides an avenue for reactionaries to excuse their desire to kill off this or that population, or starve out Africa or whatever, on the basis of preventing AGW and ensuring stability. The greatest problem of this is the same that exists in all reactionary approaches: all it does it return us back to a previous state, or some semblance thereof, without solving the problem itself. That problem is sustainability. Unless we intend on suppressing our population forever and somehow freezing our civilization in a given point of time (which is a stasis myth characteristic of reactionary ideology), we need to develop more sustainable practices and technologies in order to improve the environmental conditions of our societies and lands and to guarantee that we can grow our population without population growth being a threat to ecology, economy, or society.

Sort of?? I feel like there are multiple factors

But I also don't think the ruling class has any overarching cohesive agenda other than to stay on top, maintain their image, and live comfortably

Cus you know, psychological egoism.

Have you accepted your bogdanoff overlords?

It's a big pill to swallow

I want reclaim the black pill from r9k tbh

Black-pill is now post-modernist nihilistic egoism

Your jewish overlord B)

Yeah because it isn't truly black if you believe in values

It's watered down blackpill

That would mean they never speak

This is why the old blackpill is spooked

Because it's built on sad virgins on the internet having a psychological break over girls not wanting to fug them
A truly black pill would be separate from that

And also would be expressed as less dreary

Because not giving a fuck doesn't make you gloomy, knowing there is no inherent meaning in life besides what we construct as a reaction to said nothingness is liberating

Ｔａｋｅ ｔｈｅ ＶＯＩＤＰＩＬＬ

Yeah, that's why I'm an egoist, apathy = braindead

Alunya is best girl sorry

Disgusting