Verchiel

Discord ID: 181545221916459009


3,272 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 6/33 | Next

Second of all, it's very clear that IQ is causal

B/c IQ as being causal for SES is very clear

But IQ is obviously a very prominent factor

Especially when you can put these niggas on ascending GDP and get virtually ascending IQ with very few outliers

It's primarily causal when determining SES ๐Ÿคธ

Big brained nibbas make big civilizations

**you can put these niggas on ascending GDP and get virtually ascending IQ with very few outliers**

Finding one special exception =/= the rule

You're the only one treating it that way.

It just makes you uncomfortable that if you're a shitskin or you've been cursed with a poor environment that you're going to have a lower average IQ and thus be at high risk of being poor/unable to run shit

๐Ÿคท That's fine. Have fun moving from gentrified region to gentrified region fleeing niggers and spics as they increasingly contaminate urban areas.

I'll be living in reality where homogeneity is the key factor to stable societies.

And in this case, stable economic growth ๐Ÿ˜‚

Nigger, that's not how I refuted them

**Yes. I share plenty of similar, if not the same values with Jews and Pakistanis, but that doesn't mean that we're going to share the same goals based on those values.**

Sharing values =/= being cooperative.

Otherwise Muslims would be voting conservative.

You keep associating these linearly defined values with identity and culture, removing them inherently from context.

๐Ÿ˜‚ It definitely refutes the study.

The study offers no controls for race, or how people cooperate based on these values

Children wouldn't be segregating in the cafeteria if that were the case

My assessment is also based on the excerpts you showed me

Ingroup bias plays a role in homogeneity

I wonder what the frequency of mixing is within those communities, non-anecdotally

*You making everything about relationships between white and black people*

It's an indicator species relationship that we have tons of statistical data on

*Mixing is kinda irrelevant to ideological cohesion*

Gee it's almost as if I'm not Muslim

That **we won't be marrying anytime soon**

Holy shit what do they teach you at that soyboy university

You really just make shit up half the time that doesn't make sense.

Now first of all, there are circumstances where "ideology" can trump race, but it's normally between high IQ relationships, and with the aim for status

For one, the prevalence of interracial relationships is *low*

If you believe America is generally culturally uniform, this shouldn't happen at all

There's a dating site that did an analysis of interracial couple pairs, I'm trying to find it

Basically goes like this, as is the same with every other analysis I've seen:

Highest interracial pairing is White Male, Asian Female

Bearing in mind that interracial relationships are not as common, the general purpose for mixing is once again for perceived status/high IQ pairings

You'd think Asians would mix more flat out because they're urbanites, but the women are the only ones more prone.

I can't find the other table. I'll look later.
Bear this in mind, and the meta that comes with it: https://demographics.virginia.edu/DotMap/index.html

Look at that map. These people aren't segregating by conservative or democrat, etc. they're segregating by *race*

Look at Asian distributions. Once again they should be even. Nope, j/k they also have racial blocks. As far as I've seen they're the only ones who sometimes have a diffuse distribution. K selection etc.

Time and time again there is a racial breakdown in virtually every social trend thinkable. Race is *playing a role* in still arguably the most liberal and multiracial era imaginable. This is a strong testament to the power of race as a general arbiter, which appears to be wholly *natural.* I don't know why you're so keen on trying to weed it out like this is a problem. The idea that we need to or that we should is extremely Machiavellian and thus, well, *Jewish.* ๐Ÿ˜ฉ

*Also, people ARE separating by ideology*

Two, they're not choosing residence based on ideology. Look at the damn dot map. Americans have been living this way far before the country was ever "polarized"

You see virtually everyone avoiding Black neighbourhoods. Try again. The races are just carrying their voting dispositions with them as they move (minority dem, White rep)

The India video talks specifically about economics and literacy

As usual, nothing is ever rebutted, the goal post is just poorly shifted.

I'm taking some time away. See yall later on.

But it's even funnier because Jews are *actually implicated* ๐Ÿ˜‚

Also are we having the "consciousness is a byproduct of the brain" argument again?

Pls stop this. We've got federal papers detailing the reality and reliability of astral projection

There's very apparently another "non-bodily" component to consciousness

And the emergent consciousness theory cannot be substantiated by the current mainstream evidence anyway

Emergent theory is ๐Ÿ’ฉ. Demonstrate what consciousness is first, then we'll talk.

My opinion? The normative explanation, that most cultures and races have been describing time and time again for thousanda of years is true for the most part.

And junping through 'scientific' hoops to ascertain whether or not you have a spirit is for retards.

This is how that shit always starts

Nice knowing ya Nihon. Population replacement incoming.

>implying you're a boomer for using common sense

Demographics are destiny ๐Ÿ˜ฉ

We see the same IQ to race distribution *everywhere*.

A dimension -> a plane -> a space

3,272 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 6/33 | Next