your critiques show everyone that u have not actually understood what u have read

im gonna need a drink for this thirst cause

addie has essentially conceded before that the argument is logical but he thinks that it doesnt prove god somehow

which show a lack of understanding

well thats sorta true
azov is part of ukrainian military and therefore the US uses israel as a proxy for weapons and funding

lmao no no on

cringe moment

not understanding the argument moment

this explains why that critique is cringe

via logic

so you now admit that this argumentation offers a logical proof for something we refer to as god?

addie you have shown a lack of comprehension again

the characteristics necessary for a first mover are the characteristics of god

imperfection is unrealised potentiality

this smacks of some kind of omnipotence argument
''durr can god make a square circle''

yes thats not a potential doe
there isnt a potential square circle waiting to be made out of a wood block
contradictions have no potential

lmao

unactualised potential

contradictions have no potential lmao

there is not such a thing as a potential square circle

no

how are you coming up with that lol

lmao wtf is this argument

although its interesting to see addie has fled the discussion on aquinas after claiming to understand it

are you atheist @Gromp

fair enough
i used to be

edward feser and aquinas kinda christpilled me doe

feser is an american philosopher

does some good stuff on religion and god etc

i hvent read fesers books tbh
i just listened to like 10 hrs of podcasts etc

i assume they are good doe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNxnGQDT0As

this was one my theist friend showed me when i was still agnostic that sent me towards theism

i was parroting some of dawkins arguments at the time

also this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9R3BXJVjwKI

if you allow for violence then there wont be multiple parties for long, the most radical and violent will rule

yes

descend like a howling wolf upon the enemies of God!

jk

i dont advocate for violence

it could cause either a total atomisation of politics or perhaps a unitary movement

either way everyone gets what they want/ deserve

neet candidates

gimme political gibs

problem is in uk it isnt enforced
all the major parties do it and get away with it

there needs to be a quasi religious regulatory body that is tasked with the maintenance of that sort of system

revert back to anarcho-nomadic-homofuturism

yes
it was the usual larp but it had some cool shots @Asdrubal

most likely DIAS or something

new atomwaffen cell
they have better aesthetics and equipment, atleast as far as we can see from their propaganda @Otto

they might be but thats always a possibility with these sorts of groups

lmao fucking druggie anarchists

^

some kind of wealth cap would be preferable

yeh the tax system should steer the country towards autarky

autarky is a good thing, free trade has failed to deliver what it promised

basketball americans and bagelish people

we should have torture farms for pedophiles and rapists
torture them for decades

make them carry out endless backbreaking labour
use them as slaves

we should enslave criminals tbh

make them repay their debt

would be fun to watch tbh

with no animal cruelty doe

only reprobates fighting each other

american values gay

only european values

because they are true ig

yeh as far as im aware the belief in the flat earth was never part of christian doctrine and those bible quotes as maksim explained, do not say the earth is flat or that heliocentrism is wrong, the belief in the flat earth was fringe within christianity

from what i know flat earth and geocentrism is based in ancient astrology and mysticism

yeh it was classic prot stuff tbh
''um i dont understand this greek stuff so im just going to form my own interpretation''

paganigga LARPer in her rn?

you worship tree and marvel superhero? @Fed

lmai

lmao

''do you deny that salt comes from chlorine????''

salt is therefore poisonous

lmao

bro if thing comes from thing then it bad mkay

what does that prove exactly? @Fed

lmao

ok wtf is this paganigga on

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc ?

bro the bible is only reliable when i want to say jesus was jewish mkay

lmao

jesus was a based semitic aryan phonecian, prove me wrong

lmao

we can see that the bibles descriptions and events line up well with other resources from romans etc
other than that we take its legitimacy on a degree of faith much like all things

paganigga rage quit

imagine not knowing whether you want to use the bible to say that jesus was jewish or say its fake to argue that he wasnt against jews

absolute 4iq

lmao the paganigga iq generator