>communist

posting dog porn in 3,2,1

didn't say that

try harder

there we go

humans rights say whites have a right to self determination

human rights bad

>pale skinned freckled blue/green eyed redheads aren't white

😆

>muh magazine from 150 years ago

given the fact that immigration was restricted to only whites in 1870 and irish were allowed to immigrate to the US

your point is retarded

@DoobyCooby that's not what anyone does lmao

the levels if strawmanning

no one says that

literally no one

there is so much scientific data for it no one would need to reach that hard

>the magazine from 150 years ago proves blue eyed pale face people who cluster genetically with other europeans aren't white

they do now though

Maybe that existed to some extent in the 1850s when they were first immigrating

people know what white is

are you retarded?

>magazine from 150 years ago making fun or irish people proves modern genetics are wrong

amazin

I invite you to demonstrate equal genetic distance between,, the Irish and the Slavs and then the Irish and Australian aborigines.

The fact is one group has become part of american society quickly and the other group has never managed to do so

@Monolith do you reead dabiq magazine?

>m-muh satire article from 150 years ago

proof?

Prove that the average person in the 1800s thought irish were black

you're retarded

sigh

you should try harder

that's not even what your article says

your meme article says they were black

which i asked you to prove

and which your article doesn't say

you said the cartoon that displayed them as black were mainstream views

yet they let irish immigrate despite white only immigration policies

they were let in small numbers not comparable to the irish

many of them were deported later as well

oof

I like how every place that isn't censored becomes right wing eventually

>when you censor people you will get better ideas

makes sense

ah like people who post dog porn

there's a difference between moderation and censorship

good to know

https://archive.org/details/saleelalsawarim4

https://archive.org/details/lheb_alharb

who cares

yeah that's pretty retarded 80% of the soviet population is in front of the urals

>tfw no food and oil and most of your population has been captured but you still can win

gommunism

>regroup hundred million people to far east build new factories and convince china to give you millions of fighters as i'ts fighting japan

k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq_1l316ow8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NsrwH9I9vE

>tfw you need to constantly try to incite a revolution and fail most of the times but it's a natural progression

are you retarded?

Cringe

ok

Block me nigger

You won't

Weird how natural disasters effect the communist countries so much worse

Hey dumbass read the article

In the first paragraph

> The North Korean government and its centrally planned system proved too inflexible to effectively curtail the disaste

what a weird lie

did you not think people would read it?

Or it could be the fact that they have an IQ around 70 and cannot do agriculture

How is it not a point?

You cannot produce if you don't know how to

what?

Because they're not able to produce

The same thing has happened in south africa

And zimbabawe

How is it unprofitable to produce food?

tf

why would they sell it for free?

It is people buy food

People are willing to pay for food

This was from the korean war which he didn't even link

the famine was in the 1990s

it took 40 years to recover?

How do you destroy soil by bombing it?

you're saying they destroyed the arable land

This isn't a very important point I was just wondering how that makes sense

Is the land that different from south korea's though?

I don't know Leah is defending it as a communist country

For some reason

It doesn't have communist in it's name

If I recall correctly North Korea outpaced South Korea in economic growth in the 1960s and 70s

How does this make sense if you're saying the poor economy was caused by bombing

Why did the economy stall out then?

North Korea got more foreign aid in the 80s and 90s

1% a year

I'd have to ask for proof the bombing is what causes the famines because it doesn't make that much sense when there was good harvests in the 50s and 60s with less foreign aid

And then the famine that was posted happened in the 90s

yes but why was it reliant on the soviets?