That’s not “real communism”

Get it rite

^

People like Jason Unruhe are willing to leap for every chance they get to be edgy and support failing governments like Venezuela and North Korea’s

There are/ have been real socialist examples though, such as Socialist Cuba and Albania

I’m against North Korea and Juche ideology itself, but for its crappy GDP and sanctions imposed by other countries it’s done well for itself

Although their son gun policy has harmed their people’s living conditions it was necessary to defend itself

They removed it for their constitution after the collapse of the USSR

In fact, the term is so often misused nowadays that I think most people do not understand that communism= goal of socialism: a classless, moneyless and stateless society and socialism=the steps taken by the dictatorship of the proletariat toward the eventual goal: communism

How can North Korea even aspire to have a classless, moneyless and stateless society when the USA and other first world capitalists are so determined to destroy its potential to achieve such a goal?

I live in uk same here

People like Jeremy Corbyn labelled socialist because welfare

>socialism is bad

Comrade corbyn yes

Exactly

Yea no

But Apparently so

Because the Labour Party was never and will never be socialist

It’s more just liberals trying to be edgy by quoting the Communist Manifesto a couple times

And British communist parties such as CPGB and CPGB-ML are a fucking joke

I like Maoist theory because it develops on Marxism-Leninism: the idea is that the elite have since offered exceptional living conditions to the third world that used to be in their backyard and by doing so have pushed their dirty business into other (third world) countries where profit can be made at the expense of labour costs, just like London’s factories in the 1800s but where we cannot see them and benefit from their output, thereby essentially becoming puppets to the bourgeoisie. Parties like CPGB and its ML alternative create problems within the first world in order to justify their means for existence in the first world, where there are no problems

I think the best way therefore to understand the proletariat would be to see it as “the proletarians *(are those who)* have nothing to lose but their chains”

*”how many levels of irony are you on?” -“idk about 1917 my dude” -you are like a baby -watch

T H I S

>have to pay subscription fee to join and to vote or stand for office in a ‘communist party’

Even for emails

Like wha

lol it’s almost like one of those ancap memes

No

I wouldn’t mind if they were a legitimate party

But they are a joke

Exactly

They try to defend the DPRK all the time, and with that the Kim Dynasty and have a weird love for Stalin of all people when their party is led by a businessman

((The irony))

I think it’s time for a

Soviet

Reunion

Great idea!

I thought this was a communist server lol

Lol what

Religion should be outright banned

And no communism is not retarded

Religion was a horrible idea

The only reason religion has to be put down is because of its creation

Religion was created by man and as such did not offer a culture

>religion has maintained order

Kek

Because their messiah was a peaceful person

Iran?

Srsly

Very religious country

Therefore successful

Like u said

Yes

No country has been founded with atheism

Although Albania 1967 was the first constitutionally atheist state

Your point does not make sense

I know

That socialist Albania was a state yes

Your point no

Atheism is a popular belief only now after there was enough evidence to prove it as a viable belief system

Although Religion has always and will always work through lies and deciet

No

Age of Enlightenment

Problem?

Wow

If anything it is a problem that Islam is the fastest growing religion

Shows that belief in a warmongering paedophile is somehow justifiable

Ultimately none are

But it is the primary concern at the moment

So?

I’m sure you could say that about many things

Yes ik

It has benefitted the bourgeois and not the proletariat

It is beneficial for only one side of the coin

No it wouldn’t

Wew

Gulag now

No it isn’t

You just said that religion has good things in it and is part of culture and thus should be practiced

That is regressive thinking

The point of communism is social change

It didn’t fail because it was never achieved

Are you even familiar with the exact definition of communism

How am I a liberal

The ussr was an attempt to achieve communism through dictatorship of the proletariat

Just like the prc Vietnam etc

*socialism has

Communism in Ukraine maybe

I said maybe

USSR was good until Krushchev

1917-1953 best years of the USSR

Cao is right

Is Hoxhaism a legitimate thing?

My dad lived in socialist Albania

It was

Not even lying