pretty standard tbh

And, what influences these factors? 🤔

I'll take the bait hook line and sinker, its fun

So if you remove those barriers, and become more economically developed, women are opressed. If you keep those barriers, and are less economically developed, women are opressed. If you So if you remove those barriers, and are less economically developed, women are opressed, and if you keep those barriers, and become more economically developed- women are opressed.

>contrarian can't even argue his opponents points effectively

"you can't fuck a doll, its objectifies women"
"I wanna fuck 40 dudes"

This is literally a circle arguement fallacy, in every single format of a society women are unable to "do what men can" because of societal pressure

"A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. Our adopted term 'Socialist' has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true Soicalism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, or efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an inidividal brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false."

They used the term Socialism, but they weren't Bolsheveks.

"Van Gogh created this masterpiece" vs. "The workers who mixed the paints, made the canvass, have as much equity in the creation of said masterpiece as Van Gogh himself."

Do not confuse NatSoc or NATZEEISM with Bolshevek Marxian Communism. They are antitethical world views.

I should put echos around Bolshevekism tbh

Its pretty much wholly Jewish

Well, who ran the white revolution in Russia?

Its quite interesting that a bunch of Bergs, and Stiens, head out to russia, change their last names to ethnic ones, and run a zionist sponsored, jewish controlled, collectivist ideology that murdered millions of fellow jews

Yet thats caved in head by Kazimir k

*Who's Who in World Jewry: A Biographical Dictionary of Outstanding Jews

"Wholly Debunked."

"dA cOmMiEs wErE dA rEAl zOG"

And? The Vice President was a known Communist. Doesn't make the USA pro-communist, does it?

Don't believe me? Thats fine. The Jews literally tell you themselves that they are responsible for the white revolution

Lol. "Who's who in american Jewry" is the correct book. Author, a Jew, puts, who do you think, front and center as a promient Jew? Leon Trotsky.

Hmmm. Alright, I'll take your word for it. I retract my previous statement, based on the facts you present. Everyone can be wrong, afterall. Ty for the info

I think thats somewhat accurate, but I will conceed that post-ww2-Stalin, and moreover the Soviets, were anti-jewish. Without proper data, you cannot accurately describe the whole of the Soviet Union under the full sway of Zog.

I also disagree. Sure, the law of inheritance is applicable to say, enterance into Israel, but that doesn't negate obvious double standards in say, the goy-right-wing in America, for example. Evangelicals aren't Jewish, but they praticially treat them as war heros for just having Jewish blood.

Boomers aren't gonna vote yang. >Insert Boomer economics here

I'd bet more on a shitlib like Pelosi or Hillary winning. Yang + Bernie will get the shaft / again. Asian man isn't a huwite saviour, but the Republicucks aren't eather.

That I'm really not surpised

Champagne Socialists n' all that, white, liberal, upper middle class