well I meant flamboyantly gay.

Not many out there

cept hollywood

I would say depends more on personality

The left sure likes to make judgements based on appearance :/

ya that's crazy

Well round trips means just as much climb as descent though

I like walking a lot too

oof

timcast new vid

oof

newest in timcast feed

wat?

well what was suggested would be take from the poor

" take everyone who works 2 jobs and take one of those jobs away and give it to another person"

tbf not everyone in NK thinks it is normal

@Thirg well what you said would technically lower unemployment

But the logic she was using was under different context

course looking at that, there are more jobs available than are people unemployed

The logic you are using would be something valid to look at though, but Cortez was saying that people are working 80 hours and cant feed their kids

suggesting that she thinks that people are necessarily working 2 jobs

Someone should ask her about supply vs demand

A lot of things lie somewhere between art and science

If you throw out the art or science aspect you run into trouble

Boom Bust Boom was correct

still have not taken econ yet

pretty straight forward stuff though

if taken with a grain of salt

the green brothers have a channel

terminology and what not

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ez10ADR_gM&list=PL8dPuuaLjXtPNZwz5_o_5uirJ8gQXnhEO

is it though

those places are warm

So what you are saying is Obama is now alt-right?

By today's standards it is hard to be left of Centre right

Obama is also a big talker though. He has made a lot of promises only to never to bring up the subject again.

For sure the right is the liberal side now

Funny that conservatives and liberals are on the same team

Well left and right originally just came from the 2 majorities in an old for m of congress

Not socialism vs capitalism

Democracy 3?

Nvm

But for real though, gay marriage becoming universal accepted has been one of the worst things for the left as far as membership

Many on the left are there for one issue

Conservative and liberal gets mixed up with left and right I feel like

I've never felt the need to drink too much

Well, Fox will be Disney anyway

Skull candies are great

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-lite

kinda interesting

Others have described it as an offshoot of the alt-right, in that it claims to reject identity politics

part of the page

" As with the alt-right, the alt-lite commonly shows broad support for Donald Trump, criticism of and/or opposition to political correctness, Islam, feminism, welfare and illegal immigration. "

Calls it a movement, and still a variation of conservatism

at this point it is basically implied that alt right are those things

alt-lite is called like the alt-right minus the identity politics

To paraphrase Jordan Peterson, the rights red line for extremism is when it vies for ethnic based policy and standards

30% can be a lot of things to disagree with though

And another problem with labels is that you can find yourself subconsciously thinking what would my label do

The problem for me i guess specifically is that I don't totally line up all that well

If I have to say that I support someone it is better that i mention multiple people to show that I am somewhere in between these people

I wouldn't say well defined

other than centrist maybe

or independent

https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=51.2&d=41.0&g=43.8&s=54.2

Well technically I guess the way this might work is that you look at many different values like in 8 values

And the values you feel more strongly for you might not need a label but if you lean that way greatly it surely kind of shows what you hold in high regard

It's just better to say that you are for certain values and beliefs unless you are close enough to something to be able to distinguish that you are something minus a couple of issues

Ya that Indian news bit is super fucked up

With 8 values even that feels largely not super accurate because it asks questions where it really depends

ya

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

some good company though

Scholars now tended to associate it with the theories of Mont Pelerin Society economists Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman and James M. Buchanan, along with politicians and policy-makers such as Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan and Alan Greenspan

As far as wikipedia defines it

English-speakers have used the term "neoliberalism" since the start of the 20th century with different meanings,

Wikipedia is amazing

I think what 8 values is using is what wikipedia would describe as far as neoliberalism

I haven't seen much evidence of wikipedia being false and misleading to a significant degree

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigel_Farage

not finding any issues here

Let me put it this way, how much of wikipedia would you say is reliable?

On politics would an encyclopedia be better?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/hbsworkingknowledge/2015/01/20/wikipedia-or-encyclopaedia-britannica-which-has-more-bias/#dbe43527d4ab

The number of revisions required to start showing this effect, however, is quite large—at least 2,000 edits—and the articles most read by users aren't necessarily those most revised by editors. "To some extent, we are not seeing the scenario where too many cooks spoil the broth, we are mostly seeing an insufficient number of cooks," says Zhu.

If Wikipedia would like to improve its objectivity, Zhu recommends that it encourage editors to revise the most-read stories first, as well as encouraging people with different political leanings to edit the same article.

Certainly sounds interesting

@pratel I am not saying that Wikipedia is perfect or doesn't have controversy, there might be truth to those things but I can't take I've been told at face value if I am honest though, but I will consider those things. I just mostly go based off of what I can get out of wikipedia, and I feel that I come out of wikipedia better informed, and provided with links to similar topics that I had not considered.

Would be good to find an artist interested in making a concept mock up to see if an end product would be something worth pursuing

or also doing things barebones having just the main goals ready to see if it practically is as good produced as concepted

@pratel I don't assume any source is outright accurate

@pratel I just think it gets underused because people think that it is mostly inaccurate

We were discussing alt-lite earlier

it may have been used that way just like liberal or conservative

some accept it to be alt-right minus the identity politics

https://www.quora.com/Whats-the-difference-between-alt-lite-and-alt-right

"In addition even though the Alt Lite and Al Right labels serve a function on a political classification level I would still urge one to be cautious about overusing these descriptors as they may cloud some key differences between individuals falling under the respective umbrellas."

There is interesting discourse because many who are "alt-lite" are called alt-right

I wouldn't necessarily use alt-lite as a over encompassing grouping though

Ya

right?