international
Discord ID: 308950154222895104
752,937 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 22/3012
| Next
Today in capitalism the big business owners control the big media, you can look how they're connected, they're hierarchic and they have the same interests, they all support a capitalist ideology
We're in a control system now, and the academia has the neoclassical pseudoscientifc model; debunked by marxists economists like Cockshott
Hardly, the big media machine has a keen interest in promoting socialism
haha no
Yeah.
not even the mild ones, like Venezuela who aren't even socialists
in my country there's a socdem party emerging
Lmfao
It's totally not natsoc, it's socdem
and they manipulate them accusing them of uspporting Venezuela, even a minimal reform, they start manipulating
๐๐๐ฝ
a few nationalizations aren't socialism
You don't know much about Latin America do you?
I speak Spanish
I can get the sources
Neat. So you've gotten into the CIA cointelpro manuals ?
well, the CIA financed the opposition elections against the Socialist Party of Chile for example
The whole shitshow is kabuki theatre.
Various letter agencies and etc, it's a way of keeping OPEC in line
Socialists are too impractical and impulsive to see this shit.
@OF-8 Didn't CIA invade Afghanistan to stop communist? What about cold war?
And a lot more
The US has military bases all over the world
What about Vietnam, North Korea?
If two people are slapboxing in Biloxi, CIA has money on it.
Look. From a geopolitical standpoint the world is way more complex than you give it credit for.
I'm only interested in my tribe.
The rest of you are cattle.
politicians have to follow the interests of the economy, otherwise they screw it up
You work that out as you wish.
the dictatorship of the capital
your tribe can't be free until world socialism
as it keeps the capitalist relations of production
capitalism isn't a model in a vacuum
it becomes distorted, the market distortion is a dynamic which is inevitable
only for copyrights, to reward or not reward the innovation, is enough to push for corporations
how do they have an interest in socialism when socialism would remove all their profits?
Winning.
We nailed socialism millennia ago.
The key: leave Jews out of it.
are you part of the bourgeoisie?
oh jews...
yes, tell me how removing the big capitalists (nazis say they're jews) would change the base of the economy
He is a future millionaire. He just got unlucky for a moment.
you have to change all or new big capitalists would emerge again
that is, with socialism
also criticism for market socialists
again the market distortion is present and it leads to a big enterprise sooner or later depending on the economy, business to big to fail
since there's no planning
No. I'm saying that Marx fed you a poison pill.
why?
Because he repurposed the kibbutz and left the "150" cap off and called it socialism.
Coming from a family of rabbis he either knew, perfectly well, that this would be chaos, or he's fucking retarded.
Either way he contradicts to deleterious effect the teachings of the Talmud with regard to community building. For this he should be removed from the socialist pantheon.
As swiftly and decisively as one might remove kebab.
aaah you believed the judeo-bolshevik-international-communist conspiracy of the nazis
I didn't know this was a nazi creation.
None of my sources were nazis.
it is
the economic theory of socialism has nothing to do with judaism
Maybe them figuring it all other is why they removed kebab so wrll
LMFAMFAOOKAY
in fact, Marx say about religion that it is the opium of the people
he says that so the people don't see his plagiarism
and Hoxha achieved the first atheist state
removing Islam as possible, which was reactionary
against women rights
Good thing nazi lost due to their systematical failures.
Removing Islam is required.
nazis were supported by capitalists like Henry Ford
Islam as a social system is a branch of socialism incompatible with modernity.
islam isn't a branch of socialism
Same as Marx
you didn't read marx
neither utopic socialists
You don't read religious texts.
I read both.
I read about catholicism
ex catholic
Oh wow. So you saw how cucked the coptics got eh?
No
Then you didn't read about Catholicism.
Tfw shallow scholars
I was educated in catholicism
but I guess there are different sects
and what has islam to do with marxism?
You know. Lately I've been coming to Marx from secondary sources. My first and only pass through whatever was in that torrent was maybe six years ago.
I'm looking for an excuse to pick it back up, but I haven't found enough intelligence within Marxist dialectics.
Usually this means I ought to leave it down.
@OF-8 Secondary sources merchanting you, brother. Read first hand information.
if you're a worker they're putting an ideology against your own interests
Why would not Marx be anti-socialism
Also is zizek and baidou anti socialist?
Marx says that religion is the opium of the people, when people are in misery
They search for Gods
to comfort themselves
The will never not search for gods
and not act
It is not a matter of comfort it is a primal human trait
This is marx' poison pill
@OF-8 If you never read first hand info you never know really. You can't make your own criticism
So Lenin in Marxism and religion says that we need to be patient for objective economic conditions, then I'll get away; but religion doesn't have to influence the party
I didn't say never read
I said looking for an excuse to make a second pass.
The Constitution of the USSR allowed religion but not against the aims of socialism, against women rights, that is, against socialist and progressive values
Whatever was in that torrent.
It was a stoned weekend idk. That's how I learn philo
I pirate stuff.
So I get a bunch of books at once and plow through em
First pass is "is this bullshit"
So far; bullshit confirmed.
Give me a reason to challenge that assumption.
Lets find out the book name. What was it about?
U want link to torrent?
I'm playing a game here. This isn't about dialectics.
You sure are. ๐๐๐ฝ
What about this one; does this resolve your dilemma? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital:_Critique_of_Political_Economy
It was several volumes of bullshit.
That period of German language is kinda retarded anyway
"possibility meeting desire"
Not to quote Marx specifically.
Surplus capital both originates from and flows towards the confluence of possibility and desire, regardless of our individual perspective of this confluence's decadence
Every time I execute a trade, famalam
@OF-8 You don't have an ability to read long books, do you? You have to get refined info from low-key sources.
That is the reason you cannot criticize yourself.
U wanna screenshot of some book app?
there are easier books that aren't capital
that can be read in one day to understand it
Correct according to whom?
Lmfao
Yeah. Your hylic shenanigans are unwelcome.
This is dogma not discourse
@OF-8 If you don't read it you will always have to follow your low-key refined propaganda
You have to read books yourself
Don't read what
That's my fuckin point here you pleb.
Marxist theory is garbage. Give me a book which will challenge this.
Holy shit you people are anti-intellectual
You didn't read the "garbage"
@OF-8 I've read Main Kampf and other nationalist books. I'm able to read them. Nationalists can't do the same
I read the garbage a long time ago, remember it being garbage, I wanna see what all the plebs are on about
And why do you say it is garbage, what's wrong?
Mein Kampf is the same anachronistic Austrian gymnasium shit fest as das kapital
That is why we are going to annihilate them.
Mein Kampf has pseudoscientific racism and mason conspiracy inside it
Marx discovered labour exploitation
Yes and Marx tells you that seizing the means of production will drive the people into a forced freedom.
So...
Same garbage, same teaching method, same disaster.
forced freedom?
and why do you seizing the means of production is garbage
the nazis didn't do that
Ornament; I was analyzing the ideological underpinnings of GATE when I found Marx; which is why he was dismissed so quickly.
I was not hoping to get into the problems of the bourgeoise, simply figure out why the education system in USA is so fucked.
It comes back to Marx in the most fucked up way
no, but from liberalism
private education is the problem, here public education is a treasure
I educated myself. It works.
you probably misunderstood marxism
Teach the kids how to learn
you say the ideological underpinnings
I'm going on a vague memory and "how the fans behave"
what's the problem then?
How do I challenge this notion
That marxists are intellectually lazy and stuck in a containment ideology
No, Marx studied a lot, just check the biography
as well as Lenin, Stalin and others
they have plenty of volumes
Yeah see that's an intellectually lazy answer.
RTFM
rtfm, like mao
you're the lazy here
go read from what you don't know instead of believing the capitalist propaganda and bourgeois economy
we answered all your questions
LMAO
If I pick random Marx book some Marxist will say "oh that's the wrong one"
What's the vital volume
The most concentrated marxpill
principles of communism
then, the communist manifesto, and capital is the definitive one
Capital is the one that made me ree
@OF-8 Anti-During by Engels describes most Marxist views outside of Capital.
liberals manipulate a lot about the labour theory of value
But I will take a look.
Its not too long.
It has to be Marx himself. No secondary sources.
in the critique of gotha's programme he says that labour isn't the source of all value
I don't need to get zizek'd
the theory is 95% true from analysis of the marxist economist Paul Cockshott
Principles of communism is very short
that too
I don't want to get embroiled in the pantheon of Marxist literature, I just want my insults to be sharper.
@OF-8 Its Capital and anti-During. First major works outside of more pure philosophy
I sell labor and other types of value
My labor has wrought a largely passive income.
you sell your labour force to a capitalist right?
My nails are very well manicured.
to a business owner?
Some yeah.
Some to non business owners.
ok
Some to regular folks in whom I may invest
do you have a business?
None of my money is in my name ^_^
So technically yeah
@OF-8 Its hard to read Marx for people who hardly can read books. Start with Engels or Stalin. In fact Stalin and Mao wrote for proletariat on their level.
So you might have a chance
Lmfao. Calm down the struggle session, bucko
I agree Stalin and Mao are easy
Stalin wrote for the common people
But it's more to understand leninism
Reading mao in a super racist chink voice made my friends pee themselves.
Reliably. P
But yeah it's commoner focused as hell
I just see in my family
Even your racist friend could read it.
There's a worker in my family working for someone else, a business owner
and he tries to win as much as possible, making that worker work as much as possible, with less salary as possible
this workers earns just a bit in form of salary
>not being racist
the other "value" goes for the business owner
in socialism we can plan this in a form that the workers receive what they work
>able to read books
752,937 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 22/3012
| Next