I understand the reasoning

But I'm sorry it wasn't

It was

It was the lower phase of communism

Okay

It had socialist commoditiy production, soviets contributed to the plans in order to make sure the plans thought of everyone in the counry

country*

As well as

The elections in the soviets did not allow non workers

to ensure the dictatorship of the proletariat

Y'all are hella dumb haha

@Dontkillmyvibe tell me about it.

I support right wing paramilitaries that kill tankies

This

Pro-worker, Pro-🅱enis

@Toasty Hi Toasty

Hi Sevag

this is why I hate tankies

anarchists are bad too

Left Communism is good Communism

yes

Authority is important if we want to change the system.

authority is important

yes

Democracy at gunpoint?

Socialism at gunpoint?

some dumb Russian Jew faggot and fat Chinese gook isn't going to bring a change to the system

Worker ownership at gunpoint?

They did?

🤔

they didn't

Oh

they just brought regime change

Fair enough.

fucking opportunists reee

Pffft

They did a few neat things as that wacky tank pointed out

Opportunists are the gravediggers of the revolution

But reorganizing labor is the most important part of the whole thing

while keeping the method of commodity production the same

Reformism is fucking retarded

state run businesses = socialism/systemic change apparently

That's what I was trying to say though

It isn't the same

Andrew I swear to God

Sevag I will bring hell rapture upon you

do it

I'm not against some nationalized state run shit, but that isn't what public/worker ownership is.

tomorrow, I'm already in bed

someone needs to jerk me off because I've read Marx

can't get more clearer

[small brain] : worker ownership of MoP
[galaxy brain] : negative dialectics

hehehe

inFINITE both ways

[multi-dimensional brain] : Bordiga

that's it

that's all

even INfinite has ending the moment you stop observing

[Anal sex] : bane?

@((())) ok Merleau-Ponty

who is he?

someone I should look into?

He was a french phenomenologist

Last Supper isn't what you think it is

who wrote a lot about perception and the like

and the act of observing

it's a old school GIF with Audio enabled

aaah , I'll look into him

it's just like Mandlebrot pattern

it only goes to infinity where you look and click or select

but the rest cease to exist

Merleau-Ponty sorta sits between Sartre and Heidegger with regards to being

what is his final assumption on reality?

but more grounded in materialism than a typical divide would be between the two

@((())) what do you mean?

aah a gatekeeper aka guru

like for example most theois and religions come down to everything is YOU

all is YOU

as long as you observe and have your eyes open world exist

just like in a dream all characters are you and created by you

well he was an existentialist so he grounded knowledge and consciousness in the body

conflict is DUALITY

is he like Joseph Campbel?

or whatever his name is

im not familiar

I guess he was the western version of whom you refer to

he spoke of truth but in parables

and capilatlize on it

ah

https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/joseph_campbell.html

Idea is to realize that even though we're limited by our 3d dimension, there is an infinity that's within us and that means unlimited potential

then once you convert what POTENTIAL means in Electric science is when you realize YOU contain unlimited energy to be used for whatever mean

and most of us only get a glimps of it during rare events in our life and then we go back to our 9-5

btw 5 is a sigil for Saturn aka Death / Lead

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_Cf-ZxDfZA

Engine of everything and the Vortex of all