I haven't seen any Cyrillic slip-ups from you, yet.

😉

Means we're a threat, I like that feeling

@MalinaKlaar Russian agent represent

Uncouth

@Samaritan™ I make alliance with whoever I see advocating for more individualism. Leftists advocate for social freedom while some on the Right advocate for economic freedom.

Is @Thermonuclear one of your operatives?

Some of the right

He's saying we aren't because we aren't for abolishing the United States

Where did diabeetus chat go <:sadgon:544640228166598657>

Thermonuclear be like "mmmm yes big daddy Corporation please rape me harder"

It'll be back in a few hours... probably

My entertainment is gone

My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined @ᚠᚢᛖᛚᛖᛞᛒᚣᚳᚨᚿᚳᛖᚱ

I'm adding a bunch of pictures as updates..

For instance, Trump advocates for tariffs and Tucker Carlson is also more of a Nationalist protectionist on economy. Not to mention that the Right was (and still is on some of these issues) against race mixing, homosexuality, transgenderism, legalization of hard drugs, sexual liberation, porn etc.

Tucker Carlson 2024 lets go bois

Tucker Carlson 2024 Build a Wall and make the Hispanics and Pajeets pay for it

The libertarian position would be legalization of all these, which the left has historically fought for. I see no reason not to align with well meaning leftists over statist Nationalists.

> well meaning leftists

doubt

```Interwoven as is the love of liberty with every ligament of your hearts, no recommendation of mine is necessary to fortify or confirm the attachment.

The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth; as this is the point in your political fortress against which the batteries of internal and external enemies will be most constantly and actively (though often covertly and insidiously) directed, it is of infinite moment that you should properly estimate the immense value of your national union to your collective and individual happiness; that you should cherish a cordial, habitual, and immovable attachment to it; accustoming yourselves to think and speak of it as of the palladium of your political safety and prosperity; watching for its preservation with jealous anxiety; discountenancing whatever may suggest even a suspicion that it can in any event be abandoned; and indignantly frowning upon the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest, or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now link together the various parts.```

```For this you have every inducement of sympathy and interest. Citizens, by birth or choice, of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections. The name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations. With slight shades of difference, you have the same religion, manners, habits, and political principles. You have in a common cause fought and triumphed together; the independence and liberty you possess are the work of joint counsels, and joint efforts of common dangers, sufferings, and successes.```

I'll add the satellite update later... Can't be bothered to edit them all too..

I find common ground with whoever I can, regardless of partisan politics

Me and the bois getting ready to bomb the migrant boats

Thomas Jefferson signed a law punishing homosexuality by castration. The left fought for legalization of homosexuality. This is another example of the fallacy of revering the founders as messiah. Why should I not align with leftists who are for individual liberties?

@Samaritan™

@Thermonuclear Over the course of this chat

@MalinaKlaar Aw cute dogo

😊

Y'all gonna post news stuff too, at least remember people come here principally to read new stuff.

> Whosoever shall be guilty of Rape, Polygamy, or Sodomy with man or woman shall be punished, if a man, by castration, if a woman, by cutting thro' the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half diameter at the least.
-Thomas Jefferson
@Samaritan™

"Thomas Jefferson signed a law punishing homosexuality by castration" he did, the founders also did a lot of other epic things like excluding non-white migrants and establishing a White America Policy, for a lack of a better term

You can look it up, I'm not exaggerating

I know he is a leftist plant because he thinks Sargon is alt right

I never said Sargon is alt right

Learn to read

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

He just coddles with them and gives them a platform

ok and?

WAIT

When does the right EVER talk about platforming

He platforms people who don't like that 19,000 white english girls were raped by Muslims, the horror!!

Come on this is so obvious

He's a leftist for sure

^ this tbh

>reducing everything as left or right
This is your brain on partisan politics instead of principled politics

"gives them a platform" isn't a phrase anyone to the right of Sargon can use without cringing

A right winger would never talk about it being bad to platform someone esp not ancap spergs

I cheer when White Nationalists, Fascists and Communists get deplatformed by private corporations

It just isn't how anyone other than a progressive thinks

You don't have a right to their platform, they are a private company

How is this not a fucking parody

yet another example of a ancap begging so hard to be ass raped by big corp

You cannot be a real persono

Govt. is not restricting your speech when Twitter bans you

Thermonuclear you dont have the right to clean water, the Water companies are private companies

What if a corp has more power than a gov?

If they do the exact same thing tell me how that isn't equally bad

<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

```The primary objective of Bill 64 is indicated in its title, a Bill for Proportioning Crimes and Punishments in Cases Heretofore Capital, and then stated specifically in Section 1 that capital punishment, "...should be the last melancholy resource against those whose existence has become inconsistent with the safety of their fellow citizens" and "...no crime shall be henceforth punished by deprivation of life or limb except those hereinafter ordained to be so punished."2 With these directives included in the introduction, the bill aimed at curtailing the widespread and indiscriminate use of capital punishment, which had been common under colonial law, while insuring a more uniform dispensation of justice throughout the commonwealth.```

https://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/bill-64

@Ethreen42 The difference is of consent. You can choose to not do business with the company. You cannot choose your govt. in any practical manner.

Castration was a big improvement from capital punishment.

I don't consent to being de platformed

what if there's a monopoly, or a cartel?

>ancap talking about consent

this is too good

Can people below the age of 18 consent @Thermonuclear

?

@Samaritan™ Consent is about something to which you have rights. You don't have a right to someone else's private property in the first place.

Imagine thinking you have a right to others' private property and then calling me a leftist instead

did he just dodge that question? at least stand for your positions...

Is it possible for someone under 18 to consent though? @Thermonuclear

@Greasy >What is there is a monopoly?
I don't see a problem in that

They are having trouble 'bleaching' BKP content from #palaestra_debates

See he is totally a leftist

Real ancaps say that there wouldn't be a monopoly without state intervention

He's definitely trying to discredit the banner he flies under.

Lol.

I'm not an ancap and I know that

Well if you're saying Twitter and co are just private corps and not public platforms they should be regulated to uphold the American constitution, since they actively censor and stop information they dont like from reaching Billions of people

@Samaritan™ Leftists have a problem with monopoly. They want to use the state to break them. Libertarians don't care about monopolies, they are a result of the efficiency of the rational actor.

The fact that he won't say no to can kids consent disturbs me

>monopolies
>efficiency

lmao

Libertarians think monopolies are only formed because of state intervention

@Jeremy So far I have only received bad faith ramblings and ad homs, not a single response to any of my arguments

Thus it cannot be a monopoly, because they are simply more efficient. The use of force is required to prevent market entry, @Thermonuclear.

@Samaritan™ No, that is a cucked position. The true position is that it is irrelevant whether monopolies are formed or not.

He's not a real Libertarian.

You are a leftists caricature of what a libertarian is

McDonald's having a monopoly because of their caliber is not something that should be punished

That's not a monopoly.

You are advocating for punishing success and have the gall to call me a leftist

Neither is Walmart.