it's really easy to learn

and it's very simple

like

even if u dont speak korean

u can learn to read and write in korean, phonetically, very easily

you can do that

with any phonetic alphabet

bro, some of the letters are literally shaped like how your tongue is supposed to be made with the sound

yeah, the difference?

u can do it with korean in 20 minutes

with any other alphabet, it would take a lot longer

you can do it with any language in 20 minutes

yeah no u cant

that uses a phonetic alphabet

yes you can

nah

ye

maybe u can cuz ur high iq rick and morty viewer

but most ppl cant

Korea's alphabet is simply the most efficient

literally its just reading what your languages equivalent sound is

and associating it in your mind with the other

its very easy

any language

except english

: P

but only because english isnt phonetic

yeah, but not as easy as Korean tho

it uses two different languages that use different letters but use the same alphabet

sure as easy as korean

i dunno why youre so stuck up on korean

because i've witnessed it myself

and i've compared it to other alphabets?

but you're the guy who thinks china and Russia or Japan and sweden are the same

so im not surprised that you're ignorant lmao

and youre going off of pure personal anecdote lol

you also dont see to understand what a comparison is

it isnt an equivalence

its a comparison

and sweden and russia had much the same relation

as china and japan

it's not personal anecdote

both fighting over the same piece of land for a decent amount of time

yeah but not rly

both slaghtering each other

Japan fought over korea once

actually, twice

"because i've witnessed it myself
and i've compared it to other alphabets?"

yeah, i study things as an amature

many times

twice

thats called an anecdote

lets see

hideyoshis invasion was a failure

yes

then they conquer it later

thats the first one

yeah

that's 2 times

then ww2

and china fights japan

china and japan didnt fight over korea

japan invaded china

it wasnt over korea tho

also

even if u wanna be technical

and say that yeah the fight was over korea

in the 2 thousand years of history they have with eachother

they fought eachother 3 times

it was over korea <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

and 2 of them was in the modern era

no it wasnt

the sino japanese war was when japan INVADED CHINA

not korea

only if youre counting real war

lol

yeah

real war

you can have two groups

not your fantasy

fighting each other

skirmishing and raiding

yeah

the russians did that

without a formal invasion

not the chinese

japan wasnt even unified

for most of its history

sure the chinese

yeah

actually no

that's wrong

japan was unified for most of it's history

it's only in the medieval period where it split apart

as feudal states

like europe

before and after then, it was unified for most of the histort

technically u can say that the government in kyoto didnt own all of honshu, so technically it wasnt truly unified like modern japan

but the people who lived up north were ainus

who are a seperate people completely