flat-earth
Discord ID: 484516084846952451
118,849 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 28/1189
| Next
The Japanese are not getting whole earth images every ten minutes.
Tried to show documentaries and stuff to friends and family. I even did the flat earth side of a debate podcast on the subject
Iโm sorry. Thatโs ludicrous.
You canโt tell me they are, yet cannot observe, or measure any actual curve of the earth.
But if they aren't they must be using like a quantum computer ai to constantly generate endless changing weather patterns etc
Itโs not difficult to make a constant fake picture every ten minutes.
Serious.
Yeah it would be hard
No.
As difficult as making a movie of Shrek.
It's one thing to generate a fake image but a constantly updating global image?
That's like making a movie that never ends
In real time
And splice every frame 10 minutes apart..
Itโs EASY.
Iโll prove to you space is fake.
Youโre aware space is a vacuum, yes?
So I'm told
Well, let me tell you.
That is a graph of vacuum pressure.
That is a room Nasa designed to withstand the vacuum pressure of deep space.
The walls are 6-8 foot thick concrete.
Because they have to be.
So your saying the moon missions are impossible
Because the ships couldn't survive vacuum
If you think this thing can withstand the same amount of pressure as 6-8 foot walls of concrete, God help you.
I'm with you on the moon landings
The whole thing is absurd on many levels
You can prove photos and videos from the moon missions false beyond a doubt
Every experiment to determine earthโs rotation has in fact, failed. So you would then have to believe earth is a sphere that doesnโt move.
You would think it would be easy to prove
It would be, if that were the case.
So what about the moon shadow argument?
That makes as much sense as a concave earth.
It doesnโt work.
Simply put.
So what's the problem there?
With the shadow?
A ball can never, ever produce a concave shadow. So it canโt be argued earth is responsible for the moonโs shadow.
Hmmm
Interesting
Ikr.
OK so what about the fact that they see different constellations in the southern hemisphere
That's the one I can't explain on a flat earth
Should be able to see all the stars from anywhere with a telescope
We honestly canโt.
Nah.
We have a sight distance problem even on a flat plane.
We cannot see indefinitely.
Even if all elements were removed out of sight.
We cannot see across Just like we canโt see across a crowd of people who are the same height.
I don't quite follow that... Might explain why we can't see infinitely far across the surface of the flat earth but the stars being overhead you should be able to see other constellations I would think
Because your talking about such vast distances anyways to the stars
Although I guess flat earth model stars are closer
Well, thereโs parts of Mexico that see the North Star, when they should be hidden by the proposed curve of the earth.
I have seen many examples put forward of land masses or buildings that shouldn't be visible because of the curve but can be fully seen
That's one that makes me question for sure
Also the fact that they are always parallel. They donโt tilt like they ought to on a curved earth.
If that were the case. We should be able to observe that, but we donโt.
You don't have to read that but that's what I'm looking at
The other one raised is time zones
Supposedly can only work on a ball
Flat earth already has it done.
Also that article mentioned Foucault pendulums..
Those donโt actually work.
Ever go to a science museum?
Not recently
They have them there.
And if you look at the top of the swindle.
And they are like battery powered or something right?
Yes.
Mechanized.
Scoundrels
If Foucault pendulums really were based off motion of the earth, wrecking balls would never stop moving. But they always stop when unprovoked.
So I agree that there are an awful lot of anomalies and strange things
So what was the one thing that flipped you to truly believe flat earth?
What would you say is the top proof of flat earth
The most powerful evidence
I watched that documentary flat earth clues / under the dome and it got me thinking for sure
The top scientific proof for me, is that we do not, and cannot observe or measure any real curve.
And we canโt experiment with it either on a model thatโs a sphere, for that matter.
All requirements of the scientific method, btw. That is what determines proof in this world.
Itโs why flat earth is not a theory, and ball earth is - because ball earth passes none of the method.
And flat earth passes all of it.
Observation, measurement, and experiment.
But I've seen experiments carried out that disproved flat earth
Done by flat earth people
Like what?
So I think it's jeranism
You think he proved a curve at surface level when we canโt observe that at higher altitude?
Please for the love of God, spare me.
And he sets up a series of wooden poles of equal height at distances and each pole has a hole at the same spot. Then they shine a lazer through the hole. On flat earth the lazer should go through all the holes and be visible. But when they did it you couldn't see the lazer. It was below the hole because of the curvature
That was what they said basically
But you are right it makes no sense how you could have a noticeable curve effect at that small a scale but no visible curve in that picture
A curvature consistent of a sphere that has a circumference of 24,901 miles?
118,849 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 28/1189
| Next