lounge
Discord ID: 484514023698726912
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 65/10170
| Next
Maybe
I see
Canโt exactly prove the Bible
Not going to pretend to be able to either
So your definition of god is different than the actual definition of god
So what do you reckon happens when you die?
@Providence so you're a Jehovah's Witness.
No idea
Oh shit
More likely than not, Iโll just cease to exist
Not super difficult to imagine
Thats a reasonable position, รฆtos
Itโs a different concept to assert that God is personal than to assert that God exists.
So effectively you have an agnosticish attitude, who attributes forces we don't understand to an impersonal and uncaring force called God?
I don't call the laws god I have the position of agnostic but am an atheist cause I don't believe in God
Not exactly. The gaps argument of โwhat I cannot explain must be caused by Godโ isnโt particularly of use.
๐ค pantheist, รฆtos?
I forgot
I would assert in the place of the gaps argument that what I **can** understand exists because of God.
Panentheist specifically
Ahh
Which upon a google search is apparently different
๐
Lel
I can remember you found a term for your position but can't remember the term
Panentheist Process theologist
I have a name for it
*wrong*
Jk
God exists. What exists *can* exist because of God but does not exist because God influences it.
It might be, Nat.
I just donโt think it is.
Not super complicated
๐ค so you assert that God exists ?
I assert that God does not exist. I cannot prove otherwise. Therefore I assume then that God exists.
Fair call
Mhm
The opposite call can be made to do the same as proof against God.
The breakdown is that the initial assertion determines the final assumption
You assert what you want in order to support your belief.
I canโt even deny that in my own case.
๐๐ผ Gnite
But it seems easier to disprove than prove.
So I opt to disprove.
Night louis
I can't prove that god doesn't exist so I take the agnostic position
I don't know if it does or doesn't
Might get hate for this one but i think it's more of a possibility for the concept of god to be man-made than god existing but ofc that's just a thought and I can't prove it
I canโt disprove God and can not explain why there is any cohesion in the universe. I choose to explain the laws that define the universe by saying that they are the result of God. Yet I canโt assert I would know what God is.
If something doesn't have the characteristics a "god" should then why call it god
The power to define how a universe works seems rather god like to me.
The issue is that people then assert God is a personal intelligence that influenced how the universe came to be.
Well isn't that literally the definition of god
I'd agree, however it seems to contradict all biblical knowledge
Not only biblical
You prove my point
Pretty much anything we know about god
You reject traditional knowledge of God and yet use him as a substitute for things we don't yet understand
Religion and God have been convoluted into being something that is the same, yet the concepts are distinct.
It contradicts the definition of god
It contradicts a definition of god
Likely many definitions
The question is, why is it that what we know works?
Not, โwe donโt know how it works, so itโs God?โ
String theroy innit
fuck string theory
If you want to get very deep into it, that would be one way to go into it.
Pepper ๐
String theory has no proof, though, ironically
string theory has no proof and no way of prooving it
It explains things, but as an explanation, it has not been observed
Neither does God (edgy take)
ooof
but yeah, no one uses string theory
Of course God cannot be proved, lol
I never said one could
Cause he isnt real
The meaning of god is pretty much consistent is all religions we know of tbh
I would argue that proving God would be impossible regardless of if God is real or not.
I'd disagree with you Fluff
Eh
She isnโt particularly wrong
They arenโt the most consistent
...
But they do tie in a bit
Proving God is impossible
Soldz, why is the earth flat if there is no God?
๐ค
Math and logic
Yeah Soldz why are you FE?
Lmfao
Math and logic
FE doesnt need a dome to be real
Usually it's the hard religion peeps who are into it
i would argue the general concept of a god is pretty consistant
No, it doesnโt, Soldz
God isn't the exact same in every religion, nat but the gist of it remains
All "gods" have different characteristics in different religion and they act in different ways but the gist of it is pretty much same
But if you want to use what FEs have known must be rejected in order for FE to exist **as your proof**?
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 65/10170
| Next