let me see if I can find an exchange from class last year

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN i would be super suspicious if any college thot said "Oh, I really liked it in Jamaica"

I was at in-n-out and my friend and I got up to get our food and when we came back two Mexican high school kids sat at the table...so we sat next to them until they said they were expecting guests...then we said, nah. Kept eating. They left.

Manifest your destiny

Keep what's yours

They're all just visitors.

@Freiheit - CA have you ever watched "the young pope"?

Nah

i always quote it

cause it's a very good show

@YourFundamentalTheorum there are many based scenes. I like his first homily to the cardinals ("the small door")

i like his little speech about tourists

i can't find it on goytube rn

https://youtu.be/qUU2iWxrH2M

🤔

That's awesome. I mean, yeah, it lends Prager some undue legitimacy, but Tucker still nets the greater benefit.

Yeet

I actually saw a pretty interesting take yesterday that essentially indicated that one of the primary contributing factors to the English Civil War was the decision of the Monarchy to restrict usury practices, so Cromwell was supported by the "money changers" in order to resist said initiative...

Cursed

Incidentally the only statue without random foreigners (other than me) poking around

Tucker on Prager U hahahaha 😂 👌

Rise and grind Idvntvtaevavs

We wuz kangz

We wuz kangz confirmed.

Man. I took a look at the comments section under the Axios birthright citizenship EO video, and despite its being a a hostile platform, we're still holding our own down there: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0d21nQBY8o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZyqQn2Uoo8

Stefan going all DR3 in this.

Yeah, I'm starting to ease off on the anti-DR3/Diamond 'n Silk/Candace Owens/Kanye bit. Obviously, the red line has to be the Republican Party losing sight of who their base is, but there's definitely a strong case to be made for the idea that, even if just a few percentage points of blacks can be torn away from the Democratic Party, with nothing more than a PR effort, and no substantive policy change, then it would seem to be a strategically sound move, though obviously also a hazardous one, given the pseudo-religious desire of conservative Whites to find that one BASED black guy, and use that as a false justification for jettisoning the implicit demographic aspect of their platform.

Worth keeping in mind is that the Republicans don't necessarily have to win over blacks. They can also just muddy the waters and make blacks feel less impassioned against them, lowering turnout for the Dems.

Just now realized that VDare's doing their own video digest, similar to Mr. Taylor's videos for AmRen, but with more of a rough-around-the-edges, conservative-friendly Daily Caller vibe: https://www.youtube.com/user/VDAREVideo/videos

They really need to do something with that green screen, though. Must still be finding their stride.

Eh. On second thought, probably best only to share their stuff with socks. Still slightly too edgy for normie accounts (use of the word "mongrelized" to describe the current state of Brazil).

@Bjorn - MD If the GOP wants to appeal to blacks by taking advantage of their hatred of Hispanic immigrants, that's great, but DR3 only serves to reinforce the morality of the left

@TMatthews Agreed. It's definitely a tightrope walk...

@Danimal876 I have been doing door knocking and I'm seeing that a lot of independents are totally demoralized and won't vote. They don't have the brainpower to vote for Trump but they don't like what the Dems are doing with their extreme messages and tactics.

A few years ago voter turnout was low because the sides were not different. Now it is being decreased because the sides are too different. Dumb people disenfranchised and btfoooo

@TMatthews (...though, I think, if we were to consult Martin Sellner, he wouldn't even balk at DR3, because he sees "racism" as a word that can't and shouldn't be sanitized. He would join in condemning racism on one hand, with the caveat of defining it himself as engaging in slander or the initiation of force on the basis of identity-related enmity, or demonstrating a chauvinistic desire to govern those not of one's nation, while speaking of the need to emphasize and preserve the nation's ethno-cultural identity on the other.)

I'm a fan of that approach. The word "racism" is too widespread and will never go away. We have to bend it to our will.

Bahahaha! Was just listening to Mark Dice's latest video on Brian Stelter at CNN, and he described MSNBC as MSHIV 😂

@Bjorn - MD I'm not saying we identify with the word racist. I'm saying that we should reject the entire moral paradigm of it. The left has overused that term to the point where many conservatives no longer believe them when they say it. It's also very easy to show that "anti-racists" are anti-white

At a minimum, we should push for a narrower definition of it, rather than expanding it to include things like expecting blacks to vote democrat

Controversial opinion, Gab being de-platformed might not be a bad thing, necessarily. While to a degree I support Alt-tech, Gab's lax views on censorship have turned it into a bit of a cesspit.

That will continue to produce psychos like Bowers. I had a similiar opinion when the Daily Stormer was de-platformed. At the end of the day, sites like these are disturbing to the masses and off putting to the capable people we are trying to reach out to.

People tend to forget, that outside of IE and a few other sites and figures, the movement has a very large number of dysfunctional people who are a part of it. The less of a voice these people have the better of we'll all be. Corporate censorship maybe a blessing in disguise because so many fugures in the broader movement refuse to censor and control their followers.