Message from @SeanVV

Discord ID: 522186987038441494


2018-12-11 23:02:06 UTC  

I'm not a monarchist either

2018-12-11 23:02:09 UTC  

The huns had a Divine right to rule Baghdad because they could.

2018-12-11 23:02:14 UTC  

I think Monarchy is big gey

2018-12-11 23:02:25 UTC  

Monarchy is cringe and bluepilled

2018-12-11 23:02:38 UTC  

Im sympathetic to Monarchists but fail to see how it would work in the US since no king.

2018-12-11 23:02:44 UTC  

Monarchy seems like a long term version of fascism lol

2018-12-11 23:02:49 UTC  

eh

2018-12-11 23:02:57 UTC  

Monarchy is the most heavenly form of government

2018-12-11 23:02:57 UTC  

some would agree

2018-12-11 23:03:07 UTC  

> let's just give the king's son power and see what happens lmao how could this go wrong

2018-12-11 23:03:08 UTC  

Monarchy is bad tbh

2018-12-11 23:03:10 UTC  

it just seems like fascism with a defined line of succession

2018-12-11 23:03:20 UTC  

the monarchy dice is a bad roll a lot of the time

2018-12-11 23:03:23 UTC  

The great chain of being extends from God down to the King down to the family patriarch

2018-12-11 23:03:24 UTC  

Best Roman emperors were all adopted. Circulation of elites is important

2018-12-11 23:03:53 UTC  

@Sam Southern - TN Not really Fascism was an attempt to get close to what monarchy was before it was overthrown by Communists.

2018-12-11 23:04:00 UTC  
2018-12-11 23:04:11 UTC  

I'm way late to that conversation, but @Goose "What have they conserved?" Is may favourite.

2018-12-11 23:04:16 UTC  

Fascism was trying to fill the void monarchy left, not build on it

2018-12-11 23:04:29 UTC  

Let's just let Ivanka be the next president because muh monarch's child

2018-12-11 23:04:39 UTC  

Monarchy is not fascism and fascism is not attempt to make a secular Monarchy.

2018-12-11 23:05:02 UTC  

@Jacob epic women cant normally inherent

2018-12-11 23:05:04 UTC  

To be fair to the line is succession bit, I kinda see the logic that someone trained from birth to lead would theoretically be very well suited to lead.

2018-12-11 23:05:12 UTC  

Neither is Monachy totalitarian as the rings of hierarchy were, are, clearly defined and limited

2018-12-11 23:05:40 UTC  

@MrDefault okay let's let Baron be president without knowing what kind of person he'll grow up to be

2018-12-11 23:05:41 UTC  

@Sam Southern - TN agreed 100% it just sucks that it doesnt always work out that way

2018-12-11 23:06:07 UTC  

@Sam Southern - TN If the first ruler was the one that was genetically the best of the tribe it would make sense that those genes would be passed down from father to son.

2018-12-11 23:06:37 UTC  

Imagine unironically not supporting a Barron cyber monarchy

2018-12-11 23:06:43 UTC  

this tbh ^

2018-12-11 23:07:04 UTC  

☝🏻

2018-12-11 23:07:08 UTC  

If genes determined 100% of behavior, monarchy would be great.

In real life, it's a massive dice roll.

How many of you actually turned out politically similar to your parents?

2018-12-11 23:07:08 UTC  

okay I'm out for now. Gotta finish a paper. anyone want to continue this autism later ping me

2018-12-11 23:07:32 UTC  

My jeans are cool.

2018-12-11 23:07:42 UTC  

@Jacob The church did play a huge role in filtering out unsavory monarchs.

2018-12-11 23:07:42 UTC  

I prefer basketball shorts

2018-12-11 23:08:29 UTC  

uhh ya I'd rather not give the Catholic Church any political power but that's probably not a topic for this server

2018-12-11 23:08:39 UTC  

Lol

2018-12-11 23:08:44 UTC  

Yeah

2018-12-11 23:09:01 UTC  

Rome was strongest when the Senate familial clans (the Gens) were pure and intact

2018-12-11 23:09:25 UTC  

A heritidary nobility provides a genepool for good rulers

2018-12-11 23:09:41 UTC  

This was Plato's ideal as well