Message from @Johnny B. Populus
Discord ID: 480240177571299338
We've only been infiltrated once. That infiltration was the result of human error. Had our protocol been followed, we would have detected the infiltrator.
Ah, so the quotes used in the article were from the prior infiltration. Guess that’s good to know you’re on top of things.
"Earlier this month, a fringe white-supremacist group, Identity Evropa, showed up at an ICE facility in Colorado and handed the workers there a thank-you card and gift basket"
A thank you card and gift basket??? The horror!!
We fringe nao
Im not sure how this article relates to us? Did they just throw us in there to make him seem more radical or something? I did just skim the article so I could have missed why were in it...
Its like, oh hey! Here is this guy running for governor of florida. He likes ICE and they like him and gave him money. Oh yeah and IE said thank you to Ice so there's also that....
Best way to counter infiltration: Don’t give them material.
@Reinhard Wolff regarding the 21 news article I didn't see anything bad in it at all. Literally nothing. More like that!
GEO Group is a Private for profit prison company down in south Florida
There are not ice although they may imprison those Ice arrests
GEO Group is under an I.C.E. contract here to act as a processing/detention facility. Although a private firm, it still served our purpose for one of our I.C.E. visits.
>Powerful!
@Valaska Holy cow! I like that!!! Great poster. Defending ICE - outstanding idea!!
Is it worthwhile to do employer level background checks on new members to help prevent infiltration, or is that beyond the pale?
I don't think it would necessarily reveal someone's political inclinations.
Also, we allow people to apply under aliases -- if we didn't, far fewer people would apply.
There are some risks involved but, we have a good record of keeping infiltration under control. Besides, if there is one what are they gonna report? That we dropped a banner, did some mma, did some flyering, handed out some cards, cleaned up some trash, fed some homeless people, protested outside a Mexican consulate (which was gold, wish I could've been there) & popped some green smoke...nothing to see here.
They know what we do before we do it...we don't want media there, many reasons, one of which is wardrobe malfunctions.
@Freiheit - CA You guys gotta get better nipple-slip protection.
Funny I don’t remember this question on the interview...
^ that sentence right there gives the reader (in my opinion) the impression we are asking about AH because we want them to be supportive or agree with NS or related ideology. given the characterization of us it's implied we want someone supportive of that ideology. And yes, I was never asked about that on the interview either.
I was asked my thoughts about the use of WW2 symbols
Which was to screen for 1.0 types. The question made sense
The article convieantly leaves out the context.
Yeah it's a *negative* screening not a *positive* screening question. Context and intent is everything.
The left doesn't care about context, we all know that.
lol, unless it's to explain away the actions of certain demographics, then it's *all* about context
Oh yeah they'll contextualize the hell out of something when they need to.
Weaponized context.
Podcast where IE is featured - beginning at about 4:45
Related to yesterday's article
The voiceover guy is insufferable. You can tell which side he leans towards, while trying to seem "objective". He constantly calls them "Anti-Fascists" instead of just Antifa because it makes them sound more "noble" because they are "fighting Nazis". <:really:453005408064241674>
Yeah, I mean I think the title gives it away right off the bat haha
Gotta be honest, I think that was a great recruitment message. Obviously biased, but anyone looking and getting red pilled can hear the message they are looking for and get pointed the right way.
My man Louis