its like post-western

they don't know what the box is, what the goal is, what the foundation is. Diversity can only be a strength when there is a commonality.

in his genetic example. Change the species, you have a cat and a dog. Is that diversity a strength?

do we need people who are diseased and dying? is that a strength? i mean, you are not diverse if you don't have failed genes along with surviving ones

If we want to continue the analogy of genetic diversity, eventually you get to the point where there is so much diversity within a gene pool that speciation happens and interbreeding stops being possible.

So, like I said. I agree diversity can be a strenght, but I disagree that it must be.

Agreed.

legal immigration is a way of ensuring diversity that is a strength

but thats wasict

ok, ima watch the rest now, maybe he covers these points in what i haven't watched.

then again, its racist to say you don't want your daughter to be raped if the local rape gang is known to be muslim

and i mean known...to the police known.

if you're still watching the Tucker video, I think that's most of the point Tim made.

Are you in the UK, Grenade123?

his fault is assuming that Tucker wasn't making the same point

and no, why?

Oh, that comment about the rape gang known to the police sounds like something people talk about concerning the UK.

This is perhaps another formulation of the paradox of tolerance.

i watch sargon

lol

Ah, ok.

but that was more or less the joke

saying you are afraid of your daughter being raped becomes racist and therefore "bad" if the perp is Muslim. which is ridiculous .

What's going on the UK is bonkers. Somewhere they went off the god damn rails.

when you are so afraid of being called racist, you stop going after criminals, you have lost your way

So @Timcast brings up the difference between legitimate and illegitimate authority in his banned books video today. I'd like you to reconsider the anarchist position on authority, Tim -- because even by your definition you acknowledge that authority is not something held by a person over another, but rather a deferment by a person to another they think is authoritative.

well if you think that law is our commonality, I would agree.

a lack of enforcement...we can no longer breed.

we are too diverse. cat and a dog.

Using your argument, anyone can say "I'm a doctor, put your hands on that wound" whether they're a doctor or not. Anyone can put on a uniform and say they're a police officer and "enforce" frozen zones.

That doesn't mean authority exists, it means people are deferring to someone they perceive as authority. It's no different than faith. People can have faith, but that does not objectively assert the existence of God -- it only subjectively asserts the deferment to God in that person's mind.

this vid popped up on my youtube frontpage

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLrmORuW9qM

But even the idea of diversity is too diverse to properly quantify. It includes far too many factors just to say that you need more "diversity".

i don't watch youtube anymore, if i can help it.

u must watch jootube

Race? Skin color? Income? Wealth? Family? Relationships? Geographical location? You can't take everything into account all of the time.

Are different kinds of courts and legal systems within the same country "diversity of thought"?

generally we take it case by case.

for example. when someone breaks the law...

What about in France where some McDonalds franchise owners put up signs saying "no women allowed". It's not all McDonald's. You can just go to another. Is that diversity?