Message from @Grenade123

Discord ID: 494359840811122699


2018-09-26 04:05:34 UTC  

many of them have gone off reasonably well

2018-09-26 04:05:48 UTC  

I mean, sure, almost anything in procurement can go wrong

2018-09-26 04:05:52 UTC  

but this is a new kind of clusterfuck

2018-09-26 04:05:59 UTC  

really?seems like they always turn into a clusterfuck

2018-09-26 04:06:17 UTC  

the problem here is the structure

2018-09-26 04:06:27 UTC  

or maybe i'm confusing that with the government buying more stuff than it uses just to keep the factories open

2018-09-26 04:06:30 UTC  

there have been some very good programmes which are basically an initial grant competition

2018-09-26 04:06:37 UTC  

and then a contract offer for a limited purchase price

2018-09-26 04:06:47 UTC  
2018-09-26 04:06:48 UTC  

think they did that with the Abrams or something at one point

2018-09-26 04:06:56 UTC  

we're still using these things

2018-09-26 04:06:57 UTC  

good old A-10

2018-09-26 04:07:02 UTC  

a literal gun with wings

2018-09-26 04:07:03 UTC  

we are still retrofitting them

2018-09-26 04:07:12 UTC  

and they are still really very good

2018-09-26 04:07:41 UTC  

its not a good CAS airframe unless it can stall itself by firing it main gun

2018-09-26 04:07:56 UTC  

:- D

2018-09-26 04:08:35 UTC  

Anyway, less than $2bn dollars to do the wing replacement program

2018-09-26 04:09:10 UTC  

Jesus okay so I’m still typing. I’m 10 minutes in and that reading off of laughing at trump seems to be from the representation that in the media he’s doing like shit.

2018-09-26 04:09:27 UTC  

So maybe they’re laughing at the media not the president

2018-09-26 04:09:30 UTC  

all of the current airframe designs mostly flown today are all 60-80s designs no?

2018-09-26 04:09:33 UTC  

Still, bye again

2018-09-26 04:09:36 UTC  

Or maybe they're laughing with the president.

2018-09-26 04:09:46 UTC  

lol

2018-09-26 04:10:04 UTC  

@Grenade123 the laws of physics didn't much change since the '60s

2018-09-26 04:10:31 UTC  

Now, there are exceptions like the F-22

2018-09-26 04:10:43 UTC  

which is not inherently stable, and relies on thrust vectoring

2018-09-26 04:10:44 UTC  

no, but the tech has

2018-09-26 04:11:09 UTC  

The thing is, much like in software, the urge to adopt technologies for the sake of it is among the worst instincts we have

2018-09-26 04:11:10 UTC  

only so much you can do retrofitting

2018-09-26 04:11:19 UTC  

au contraire

2018-09-26 04:11:24 UTC  

you can retrofit ANYTHING

2018-09-26 04:11:28 UTC  

to do ANYTHING

2018-09-26 04:11:30 UTC  

adopting tech is not the problem, its defeating enemy tech that is the problem

2018-09-26 04:11:40 UTC  

retrofits can always be as good as new aircraft

2018-09-26 04:11:47 UTC  

you can, but not before becomes too costly and unstable

2018-09-26 04:11:56 UTC  

Well

2018-09-26 04:12:03 UTC  

that's unlikely if you're retrofitting the same class of aircraft

2018-09-26 04:12:28 UTC  

depends on what you need to retrofit

2018-09-26 04:12:53 UTC  

I mean, computational equipment is not that large

2018-09-26 04:13:00 UTC  

laws of physics hasn't changed much since the 40's, i don't see retorfitted spitfires flying around