>not consenting to sex is different because you're an outtie

Who hurt you?

too many neet arrows

eternal summer has rendered people ignorant

But that's also #notanargument m8

maybe @Deleted User is advocating that women do not deserve legal equality?

You're going to have to explain how we get from "sexual dimorphism" to "um actually you did want that sex"

Cuz that's where the disconnect is for me

Why should the law have the power to grant equality?

I AM THE LAW

The law is there to provide a framework for just response to actions that violate the rights of the citizenry

Of which sexual assault can be counted

Why should that apply unequally to some citizens?

So the government decides what counts as equal?

not to grant equality. that it should be equally applied.

Agreed.

Equality before the law would be great.

There is currently a gender sentencing gap of 60%, in terms of prison time and chances of conviction.

Tillyer, Rob, Richard D. Hartley, and Jeffrey T. Ward. "Differential treatment of female defendants: Does criminal history moderate the effect of gender on sentence length in federal narcotics cases?." Criminal justice and behavior 42.7 (2015): 703-721.

So you're interested in equality of outcome

Starr, Sonja B. "Estimating gender disparities in federal criminal cases." American Law and Economics Review 17.1 (2014): 127-159.

Equality before the law requires anarcho-capitalism.

Equality before the law requires us to be ruled by NAZI PUGS!!!Q

No, I am interpreting what your saying like this: Asians commit murder at such a lower rate than blacks they can't really commit murder so don't bother investigating them

Yes, that's BS.

Its not really murder when they do it

You guys have gotten lost in your own arguments

That's also why the rate of false allegations, or the supposed rate, should not enter into due process.

It's also not necessarily true that it's a vastly lower rate fwiw

You're literally saying if man hard not rape.

If that was the case, we should get rid of trials in murder cases, because the rate of false convictions is so low.

But the legal definition of certain crimes has been slanted

Yes grant I am

https://youtu.be/jciTR2wvb1M

Doesn't matter if man retrained and force fed viagra hes hard so not rape.

unless they've been implanted with viagra

I doubt they're being raped

again

when has that ever happened

Or, as the crime rate changes, we would have to adjust due process. We just generate a random number, with percentages roughly equal to the false conviction rate, to decide if someone is guilty.

i literally linked an article