Message from @Tornzy

Discord ID: 497169644864667670


2018-10-03 22:11:35 UTC  

yeah i can agree its very idealistic

2018-10-03 22:11:48 UTC  

sometimes you have to fight back with what your opposition uses

2018-10-03 22:11:58 UTC  

It's not an economic model, it's a system of morality.

2018-10-03 22:12:09 UTC  

NAP is too far
A republican government is necessary

2018-10-03 22:12:18 UTC  

A Jeffersonian government is necessary

2018-10-03 22:12:23 UTC  

if you are into NAP but are being exploited by force i think you have to break the NAP to stay alive

2018-10-03 22:12:25 UTC  

Just because false convictions exist doesn't mean you don't try your best at due process.

2018-10-03 22:12:55 UTC  

Ideals will always be out of reach. You can orientate yourself towards a star without reaching it.

2018-10-03 22:13:33 UTC  

Ideals are something to strive for,

Not to implement

2018-10-03 22:13:35 UTC  

oh fuck my eye hurts

2018-10-03 22:13:37 UTC  

what's going on?

2018-10-03 22:13:39 UTC  

brb

2018-10-03 22:13:57 UTC  

so... what NAP are you folks talking about

2018-10-03 22:14:00 UTC  

but if you strive for ideals cant that result in "the ends justify the means" cancer

2018-10-03 22:14:04 UTC  

the Ancap one i think?

2018-10-03 22:14:07 UTC  

is there another kind?

2018-10-03 22:14:18 UTC  

cause it's very confusing in contexts of Network Access Protection

2018-10-03 22:14:25 UTC  

idk ive only heard it mentioned by stefan moleneux

2018-10-03 22:14:32 UTC  

lol

2018-10-03 22:14:36 UTC  

NAP = Non-aggression Pact

2018-10-03 22:14:40 UTC  

ah

2018-10-03 22:14:43 UTC  

basically, we both agree not to attack each other

2018-10-03 22:14:43 UTC  

I like nap

2018-10-03 22:14:56 UTC  

its the Ancaps version of a peace treaty

2018-10-03 22:14:59 UTC  

We know the crazies based on who violates nap

2018-10-03 22:15:16 UTC  

dude i'd violate the NAP, fuck ancaps 😛

2018-10-03 22:15:41 UTC  

ancaps are way more defensible than socialism at least

2018-10-03 22:15:48 UTC  

they are not, they're just as delusional

2018-10-03 22:15:59 UTC  

all you do is divide up the nation into smaller "personal spaces"

2018-10-03 22:16:31 UTC  

I also played a game where everyone has naps with everyone, until someone decides to dump their girlfriend, then we broke the game due to everyone warring with everyone

2018-10-03 22:16:32 UTC  

The yeoman farmer is superior to the anarcho capitalist

2018-10-03 22:16:45 UTC  

yeah actually tbh any kind of anarchy is unhuman

2018-10-03 22:17:09 UTC  

we need leaders because most people are followers

2018-10-03 22:17:11 UTC  

its also just stupid

2018-10-03 22:17:27 UTC  

ancaps will be destroyed by a Warlord who gets a big faction

2018-10-03 22:17:44 UTC  

what differentiates ancaps from minarchists?

2018-10-03 22:18:04 UTC  

ancaps don't want a state

2018-10-03 22:18:10 UTC  

they basically want a capitalist form of communism

2018-10-03 22:18:18 UTC  

capitalist form of communism

2018-10-03 22:18:21 UTC  

No state, everyone fends for themselves

2018-10-03 22:18:26 UTC  

<:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378> <:TimThink:482277772497125378>