Message from @Rabbi Shekels
Discord ID: 497394384182968320
Because your perception should differ between how powerful the politician is and, more importantly, whether or not he's a L I B E R A L
Serious answer though
Okay, then: The more unhinged the smear are against a non-liberal politician.
she would know how poligraphs work
the research around polygraphs is covered in entry level psychology books
If they have to try so hard that they couldn't find anything better, he is probably a decent guy.
which ive read
No matter who accuses whom of what, we should always take the accusation at face value while presuming innocence of the accused
considering she is a proffesor, she likely has notion of em
almost impossible to not know about them tbh
Yes, but in the meantime we should really drag his name through the media, before the story falls apart.
It's a waste of a good smear otherwise.
its like an electrician never having heard of the Coulomb principle
Well that's the media's behavior, not yours
Scooby dooby jew sexually assaulted my pebis this morning then he anally raped me with a WHOLE bottle of coke
Don't stoop to their level even if it's from the opposite side
Tim, please ban this savage.
I have calendars that say otherwise, libtard
my dudarooo, pls
this got derailed quick
clean up before anal, its common curtesy
So which is worse
And den dey eat da poo poo.
Desperate, dying old news or the new opinion journals disguised as news
I pick Bowsette.
it depends on the skill set of the reader
if you know how to read dying old news, you cna filter the BS from the factual statements, just take the factual statements and dismiss the rest
i do that all the time while reading the news.
Right. I only read the headline and the last paragraph.
if you cant, you are consuming propaganda
All between is bullshit.
Do you watch TV news or has everything migrated to your phone/computer
which is likely worse, then someone who makes videos about his opinions
as that is even more self evident
I haven't had a TV in 12 years lol