my livestream is sperging out
does anyone believe this coming out of JBP?
Everyone fucks up sometime.
what is he even referring to
Maybe he's on the coke again.
Surly he knows what he is saying is bollocks and wishfull thinking.
nah I could see him taking that position
Is he part French? Explains the willingness to surrender.
Ford failed to get him on the SCOTUS
so she's done
Jordan needs a smacking on the face by Churchill through time.
Well Ford didn't want any of this to be public anyway
"Clean your noggin, bucko"
I think he makes the mistake of thinking that the accusations are solely attached to his potential position
and not to the fact that he was even considered
It's doubtful any criminal charges could be brought up
If the United State Senate thinks you're a gang rapist, your career as a federal judge is basically over.
not just from lack of corroborating evidence, but because the statue of limitations probably applies
no but they would clearly keep up social pressure, and not relinquish that
@Orteid Thats kind of the point. There isn't even enough evidence to have an investigation so his name will never be clean.
There's not even enough evidence for probable cause. Can't even get a warrant or convene a grand jury.
I'm saying there wouldn't be much point bringing up any kind of charges or civil suit
No limitations. It happened to a minor.
I can't believe this many people are willing to play ball with this CHILD SCREAMING FOR A COOKIE that is the democratic party.
not even enough for preponderance
The fact that we treat their garbage with so much official channel.
I think that was the big mistake yeah
The first person to announce this should've been slapped firmly across the face
"I'm giving you a second chance. What did you just say?"
@Poppy Rider even if they were minors, limitations apply unless it was a federal offense
honestly less even it being "official" moreso it becoming a giant sideshow
in Maryland at least
we look at the potential results matrix and this was the wrong thing to do
I was just reminiscing about our friend Neil Gorsuch, and I found this video from Sen. Whitehouse's own YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gx4Ck38wMFc
In which Sen. Whitehouse fails to recognize the distinction between where expressive uses of money, such as political contributions, can be seen to affect politics, and where matters where the government can be seen to have infringed on rights of free expression when it imposes disclosure requirements on otherwise-private expressions, including those inherent in the transfer of funds.