Not trying to be arrogant, I just suck at sprinkling my words with sugar

and also let me find you specifically an introduction to the theories and arguments, you can decide if you want to go furter.

Me too. We are grown ups, we can handle it.

You must think the NT is somehow "corrupted" then?

Absolutely, it's full of either deliberate or negligent mistranslations. As I don't speak Greek or Hebrew, I rely on other researchers I trust, but.... I am confident, 100% , that I am correct. Let's call it 99%, as I'm still studying to improve my arguments

Because, clearly, the amount of references to Messiah being of the line of Judah is without question very numerous. Two of the Gospels even start out with a geneology, tracing his lineage

Absolutely. Jesus was a Judean

I do read Ancient Greek semi-confidently though

but not a *jew*

I don't rely on translations

Jew is just a way of saying of the line of Judah

A *judean* could be a nigger for all we know. It's like being a californian.

That's what kikes would like you to believe. Look - they say this because they are HALF telling the truth... they do descend from that line, *but* they mixed their blood a long time ago

Or rather, an Israelite living in Judea; it can include Benjamites as well, such as Paul

So they defiled the will of God - look at King Herod

he was an Edomite Jew

murdering Babies, a total evil tyrant

All jews are evil tyrants

let me find a brief explanation of this

you can explore the site in your own time, but on this specific point...

Yes, I know that most Talmudic "Jews" today, who I dont view as Jews as Paul clearly says one is a Jew who is one inwardly; and a Jew who rejects their Jewish Messiah is no Jew. Also, they are likely all Khazars

Aight

this is a good one

http://israelect.com/reference/ArnoldKennedy/Jesus%20was%20Not%20'Jewish'.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCphuicYt0M&t=295s and this

Are we defining "Jew" not as the NT defines it, but as the zionist Talmudic bolsheviks define it, though?

Because sure, if you want to do that

I think it's hard to define what a jew is in an age without banks

Look, they have changed over time, there are all different kinds of Jews who mixed with differnet peoples. and 2000 years ago, no doubt, Jews looked whiter than they do now

it would have been harder to tell them apart the farther you go back

Jews would have always sought to breed with whites, because they hated their rejection

Right. So we agree that today's Talmudic Jews are out of Babylon, this is clear

just as they do today: marry rich gentiles. There are also Jews who hate the Jews who breed with us... so it's complicated.

Yeh, but they were originally whites, thousands of years ago, as I said, until they mixed their blood

thats why they claim to be the children of Abraham, they are, but they are NOT the children of Israel

Likely, yes. I do not see how a none-white is any less than a white, though

So they are the children of Ishmael?

This is likely, yes

Hmm, maybe, I am not sure, I thought that was the Arabs

they married Caananites

Esau did, right?

Indeed, Arabs' father is Ishmael