Message from Virtue in Safe Space 3 #lobby-unvetted
What do you think should be provided by the state?
alot of things probably.. should be provided by the state
but the socialist most certainly got it all wrong.
culture preserve subsidiare
I think the wirees and telephone and internet
cables should be public
and the companies can run the actual services..
also I think you should have good
state schools only for the most gifted and smartest
and if they fail they have to go to private school
You don't think that schools should be the other way around?
also the central bank should be state owned..
I dont want schools that are meant to equalize things..
What about schools that teach the unwashed masses how to get a job, to help the nation
I estimate that more than 30 percent of the population
are so genetically stupid they will auto fail any education..
just give education to the elite.. and only if they get good grades..
and treaten the parents with expulsion so they are dependentent
Formal education is certainly overrated.
I want conservative formal authoritarian disciplinarian schools
molding the entire country into the party
I certainly wouldn't attend one.
you know about confusian education system?
success in state school should mean that you get elevated social rank
that you become nobility and eligable for work in the goverment
and in the beurocracy
every who fails state education are
the servants and lower social classes..
the voice less
the elite shall be the thinkers, artists,lawmen and
all loyal to the party
I can see how that would have merit. Especially for those who can succeed in that school environment.
its all about meritocracy..
What if there is a flaw in the system somewhere. Would the elites be free to question the system?
If you dont get this state education
then you still have rights and you are still protected by the law
the thing is that this system is very good at adjusting
the elites questions and address the social problems all the time
Yes its not regid in that sense
What if an elite, for example, wanted to question the existence of god? Or wanted to promote degeneracy?
consider our own democratic system
which is so obsesses with asking normal people what they think
to get their votes
that that the entire system is drowning in nonsensical opinions
and every fucking idiot is encouraged to believe
they just as insighfull as some professor.
in the Chinese beurocracy there where no theological restrictions.
But ensuring everyone has the same ideology can lead to a bit of insular thinking
The chinese beuroctats questioned and debated openly
every aspect of religion and tradition.
the one shared ideology is just a front for the political system..
in our current political system nothing less than a fanatical ideology
can push through the simplest reform..
Agreed. Lowest common denominator is what can get consensus. Or outright war.
More specific. The shared ideology is the education system
people will not submit to authoritive teacher-student relationships
in a democracy.
Is authoritative the proper method?