>just look at how hard they got fucked
yes because im sure germany wouldve lept to their defense, or that the polish army stood a chance against its russian counterpart

and since in Germany there was a Fuhrer, he somehow was a heirarchy

Especially for those "ein volk, ein reich ain fuhrer" speech 😉 basically making everyone equal xept for him

@Boss Bossu nazis are considered third position.
no communism and nazism have nothing to do with each other.
national socialist want counry for its people.
and commies want exploit whole country for leaders use.

>if germany didint fight back USSR would have been easily invade whole europe with no resistance.
you are aware that poland fought back right? that they resisted the russians?

Ideology is a social constructs and is very malleable. Government can and will adopt some aspect of rivals if it means becoming stronger.

Nationalists want a country for its people,

National socialists are just socialists

WARSAW CITY AT WAR

but its not "REAL" socialism 😉

@Blackhawk342 and that resistance lasted long

Besides you said russia wouldve owned ALL of europe, dont change it by saying the eastern section because ith only weakens your argument

VOICES FROM UNDERGROUND WHISPERS OF FREEDOM

national socialism and socialims have nothing to do with each other...

How long the resistance lasted wasnt in question, the fact that there wouldve been resistance at all is what matters

The soviet union used economic incentives to attract and maintain educated people to work in their nuclear program

Say what you will about the tenets of national socialism, at least its an ethos.

Hmm... Maybe Jasse is right. My friend is telling me that the US was isolationist at the time and only entered WWII because Japan attacked them. Does anyone know more about it?

National Socialism and Communist Socialism both function very similarly, just for different reasons.

they were Damian

The us government provided socialized health care and housing to their staff working in the Richland nuclear facility

US did provide economic support, but no soldiers

Only after pearl harbor did they actively join the war effort

@Blackhawk342 they got run over.
so would have every other counry too.
germany was only one who could actually fight back.

cuz they just came out of the great depression

I see

The United States continuously tried to remain as independent as possible until the Cold War forced us to become the Global Police.

funny way germany had of showing how heroic they are by attackign every "friend" country around them

Right because brittan, france, italy wouldnt have had armies by 1944

They obviously wouldve disbanded them because of the longstanding peace

If we went back to being isolationist after WWII all of Europe would be a People's Republic.

FDR's war-factories forced America to become global police

the US needed to sell their guns somewhere

Hmm true

workers were paid already

The idea that Europe stands no chance against Russia prior to ww2 is nonsense

france didint have man power to defend.
italy. well we saw how well they did....
and brits would have been fucked with out US.

We also had a vested interest in supplying these states.

>no manpower

France had a great wall, they were just so stupid to think Germany couldn't just waltz around it 😄

Ok so just to be clear in this scenario you are assuming the USSR attacks in 1944 correct?

I am talking about post ww2.

thats why they build magnito line. they didint have enought men to invade germany.

I am talking about Operation Unthinkable.