Message from @Scribblehatch
Discord ID: 504425547712167957
Because someone said the following:
-poland is at fault for ww2, they should have handed over danzig and been allies with german
-germany saved europe from communism
-russia wouldve owned all of europe if not for germany
Same reason why the Democratic republic of korea is...you know. Labels can be misleading
Goebbels even said that Lenin was the second greatest socialist who ever lived, next to Hitler
its all a farce
Fun fact: the current party in power in Scotland is nationalist. And socialist. And Scotland has the judge that will convict people for mocking Nazis. Coincidence?
AND, they used a 1 dimensional spectrum in the past
Where right-wing was for Heirarchies
and Left wing for equality
>just look at how hard they got fucked
yes because im sure germany wouldve lept to their defense, or that the polish army stood a chance against its russian counterpart
and since in Germany there was a Fuhrer, he somehow was a heirarchy
Especially for those "ein volk, ein reich ain fuhrer" speech 😉 basically making everyone equal xept for him
@Boss Bossu nazis are considered third position.
no communism and nazism have nothing to do with each other.
national socialist want counry for its people.
and commies want exploit whole country for leaders use.
>if germany didint fight back USSR would have been easily invade whole europe with no resistance.
you are aware that poland fought back right? that they resisted the russians?
Ideology is a social constructs and is very malleable. Government can and will adopt some aspect of rivals if it means becoming stronger.
Nationalists want a country for its people,
National socialists are just socialists
WARSAW CITY AT WAR
but its not "REAL" socialism 😉
@Blackhawk342 and that resistance lasted long
Besides you said russia wouldve owned ALL of europe, dont change it by saying the eastern section because ith only weakens your argument
VOICES FROM UNDERGROUND WHISPERS OF FREEDOM
national socialism and socialims have nothing to do with each other...
How long the resistance lasted wasnt in question, the fact that there wouldve been resistance at all is what matters
The soviet union used economic incentives to attract and maintain educated people to work in their nuclear program
Hmm... Maybe Jasse is right. My friend is telling me that the US was isolationist at the time and only entered WWII because Japan attacked them. Does anyone know more about it?
National Socialism and Communist Socialism both function very similarly, just for different reasons.
they were Damian
The us government provided socialized health care and housing to their staff working in the Richland nuclear facility
US did provide economic support, but no soldiers
Only after pearl harbor did they actively join the war effort
@Blackhawk342 they got run over.
so would have every other counry too.
germany was only one who could actually fight back.
cuz they just came out of the great depression
I see
The United States continuously tried to remain as independent as possible until the Cold War forced us to become the Global Police.
funny way germany had of showing how heroic they are by attackign every "friend" country around them
Right because brittan, france, italy wouldnt have had armies by 1944
They obviously wouldve disbanded them because of the longstanding peace
If we went back to being isolationist after WWII all of Europe would be a People's Republic.
FDR's war-factories forced America to become global police
the US needed to sell their guns somewhere
Hmm true
workers were paid already
The idea that Europe stands no chance against Russia prior to ww2 is nonsense
france didint have man power to defend.
italy. well we saw how well they did....
and brits would have been fucked with out US.
We also had a vested interest in supplying these states.