Message from @AdamBv1
Discord ID: 690254836045840436
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/ from 2005. So basically every single drug that they report as potential has been researched for SARS etc.
TL;DR why not throw everything at it and see if it works.
I think someone said carpet bombing stratergy.
Most of the things they want to try have few or rare side effects.
Or many side effects.
depends.
True, there is some limit to what we should be trying first.
Well I honestly have no problems with it as long as people are properly informed of it being a carpet bombing stratergy.
But something like anti-malaria meds should be incredibly well documented because they are so widely used.
Probably know every possible drug and condition interaction by now.
So we might be starting wide trials of hydroxychloroquine.
It's contraindicated in a lot of the same people that are also high risk for death so it isn't a magic pill to end this in a day
But if we can say use this as a treatment for decent parts of the population we could try letting it burn through as many people as possible fast.
But that's likely to take a few months of trial and follow-up to find out.
boomer remover
Oh boy, I hope that doesn't get broadcast too far and misinterpreted. Preparing yourself for this situation to last 18 months is not the same thing as "buy 18 months worth of shit NOW" but you know how some idiots will hear that statement.
<:swet:671404160393936948>
Spain 🇪🇸
Infected: 17,395
**Deaths: 803**
Serious: 939
Critical: 0
Recovered: 1,107
kekalek
@Monstrous Moonshine reeee
<:Trump_Pepe2:462291833427329035>
<:thinkcummunism:462305204877131786>
@WHO UK KYS
HIV medicine <:smugon:512048583806025739> not really good lmao. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001282
It's something I guess but not that impressive. Pretty sure those are damn expensive drugs too.
Not statistically significant.