I sent another response to this person

``I mean, if he wasn't convicted, then I'm not sure why an AG candidate would be bringing it up. Unless that candidate is not in favor of the presumption of innocence, in which case he clearly IS putting politics before law``

━━━━╮ This is memedog. Help
╰┃ ┣▇━▇ memedog take over
 ┃ ┃  ╰━▅╮ Discord by pasting
 ╰┳╯ ╰━━┳╯ him in 10 other
  ╰╮ ┳━━╯ servers or he
 ▕▔▋ ╰╮╭━╮ will never be a meme
╱▔╲▋╰━┻┻╮╲╱▔▔▔╲
▏  ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔  O O┃
╲╱▔╲▂▂▂▂╱▔╲▂▂▂╱
 ▏╳▕▇▇▕ ▏╳▕▇▇▕
 ╲▂╱╲▂╱ ╲▂╱╲▂

shill meme

shoo

━━━━╮ This is memedog. Help
╰┃ ┣▇━▇ memedog take over
 ┃ ┃  ╰━▅╮ Discord by pasting
 ╰┳╯ ╰━━┳╯ him in 10 other
  ╰╮ ┳━━╯ servers or he
 ▕▔▋ ╰╮╭━╮ will never be a meme
╱▔╲▋╰━┻┻╮╲╱▔▔▔╲
▏  ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔  O O┃
╲╱▔╲▂▂▂▂╱▔╲▂▂▂╱
 ▏╳▕▇▇▕ ▏╳▕▇▇▕
 ╲▂╱╲▂╱ ╲▂╱╲▂

awwww

T̃͒͐ȏ͋̋ ͬ͋ͪḯ̑ͭñ͂ͯv͐͑̉ó̅͌k̏̌̄e̔̇́ ̄͂̓ẗ͗͂҉̶̸͘hͧ̋̋e͂͐̍ ̒̈̿hͪ̌̔iͦ̓̀҉̨̛͟vͨ͛̉eͤ̎̈-̿̓͋m͛͐͂i̋͒̊nͩ̓̃d͂̿̚ ͦͩ͑rͭͦ̋e͋̽̿pͫͤͭr͛ͣ͌҉̜̩̠e̾̾̚s̆͒̌ẽ̔̏ñ̾̅t̊ͯ̌iͤͤ̚nͤ̑͌g͗͒̈҉̷̢͟ ͗̀̌ć̓̆hͪ̆ͣa͊̊̇ó̓̔s̓̿̅.̊͛̆
̅̄̒I͛̍̉n̈́ͭvoking the feeling

T̩̦͟o̵ͮ̈́ ͕̻̾i̴͍̒nͥ͒̇v̸̲̪o͙͖͘k̯͍̕ë́ͪ͊ ̓ͣ̓t̂̎ͤh̅͛ͭe͙̜͞ ̆̔̕h̾ͮͨĩ̞̙v͓̭̺ȇ̘͆-̈̾̃m̥̥iͩͯ͐n͚͎̥d̋̌̚ ̆͗ͬr͓̒ͫeͯ̿͢pͪͥ̓rͦͩ̔ẹsͯͣ̀e̢̤̠n͌̿ͥẗ́͆̂i͊ͩ́n͐͆ͥg̎̍̎ ͋ͫ͟c̒ͩ͊h̆͒̅aͮ̎ͧo̴̜sͫͬ̿.̉͛͌
͓͚ͅI͍̼͒n̗ͭ̉v̮̜̉o̷̅̽k͂ͮ̀i͚͘n͊ͤͧg ̓the feeling of chaos.
With out order.
The Nezperdian hive-mind ҉of chaos. Zalgo.
He who Waits Behind The Wall.
ZALGO!a
━━━━╮ This is memedog҉.҉ H

e͌ͨ̈́l̋̐̋҉̼̦p̡̟̽
ͫ͋ͦ╰̒ͮͪ┃̓͑͌ ̆̑ͣ┣̫̝̗▇ͥ̐͝━ͥ̾̆▇͊ͯ̔ ̃ͧ̿mͨ͒̊e̔̉͛mͮeͪͫ̆d́ͣ̑oͩͭ͏g͗͑ͥ ͯ͋̅t̀ͬ̓a̺͍͓k̆͆̀e͉̤͊ ́ͤ̍ơ̏̍v̗̿ͩe̾ͮͧr̸̰͗ ̆͗ͪ
̺͊̕ ̶͈̠┃̆͌͌ ͆̈́̉┃̿ͧ̐ ͉̘̄ ̮ͤ╰̶ͦ̒━̇ͥ̉▅̐ͮ̑╮̿̀̚ ̐ͣͯD̮̜̓iͫͦͯs̠̰͡c̴̣o̹͓ͣr̡̲̔d̂ͣ̑ ͂̌ͣb͆y pasting
 ╰┳╯ ╰━━┳╯ him in 10 other
  ╰╮ ┳━━╯ servers

```Diversity is our Strength```

It's past due for regulation of some internet companies. Change my mind.

what kind of regulation are you looking for?

Banning censorship.

Social media companies are required to carry all traffic. Like a phone company. I've been open to ignoring the ISPs, but it sounds like they're getting in on the act too. If they won't carry all traffic, they should be treated like phone companies that have to.

I can't change your mind because we are on the same side

Don't regulate companies

Protect the rights of the individual.

Internet Bill of Rights when

Lol

How far should government regulate things has always been a question.

ironic you come into being Socrates just after I finish reading The Republic

@RyeNorth How exactly is this different? You can't impose a bill of rights without enforcement.

Honestly, I think we're better off if we place the onus back on the people.

The concepts are different in nature.

Regulation calls to mind the net neutrality the big social media companies have been pushing via battleforthenet

People currently do not take enough responsibility for their own mental health and susceptibility to the material they watch.

It is only fair to impose it on them if they're being irresponsible.

How do you regulate the internet, do you regulate the service or the people using it?

The service.

My mother exposes herself to MSNBC and CNN every day, and reads books with horrible negative themes; and she lives the neurotic and tortured existence you should expect when doing that.

One angle, you're tying down the companies

So in essence how do you plan to have that regulated

Limit yourself to authentic communications with individuals for 90% of your time on the internet, and everything will go much better.

another angle, you're shielding the individual.

Whats authentic

To say that you're regulating something sets a precedent.

coming directly from their viewpoint, vs. excerpts from mass media, @SantaSoc

You're saying 'these measures limit companies'

require people to restate things rather than simply parroting them.