Message from @Mana
Discord ID: 508583655875280896
you can't possibly expect to become lobster king without having traversed at least 3
7
That's enough.
You are now lobster king.
I was there during the dominance heirarchy struggle of '83
You shall be known as Emperor Ebi.
I'm already Emperor Dr.Wol ๐ฎ
Our calendars shall reflect the start of a new era AE and BE.
your emperor name is Ebi
i insist
I think the emperor gets to decide ๐
TIME TO ROLL OUT THE TANKS!!
Okay, emperor Ebi, what should you be called?
i dont get it
๐ฆ
่ฆ ใใณ (n) prawn; shrimp; lobster; crayfish; (P)
่ฆ ใใใ (n,uk,iK) frog; kajika frog (Buergeria buergeri); (P)
่ฆ ใจใ (n) prawn; shrimp; lobster; crayfish; (P)
่ฆ ใใใ (n,uk,iK) frog; kajika frog (Buergeria buergeri)
่ฆ ใใใ (n,uk,iK) frog; kajika frog (Buergeria buergeri)
่ฆ ใซใจใซ (n,uk,iK) frog; kajika frog (Buergeria buergeri)
<:TimThink:482277772497125378>
its golden
I think I've gone slightly autistic. Some YT nerd was complaining about the outrage post-Diablo unveiling, and how it's embarassing that people are so upset (and in the manner that they are showing it). So I wrote like an 800 word response to it. I'm surprised the YT commenting system even allowed it. ๐ค
"Multiple standards of health care for transgender and intersex people emphasize that recognizing an individualโs self-identified gender, not their external genitalia or chromosomes, is the best practice for providing evidence-based, effective, and lifesaving care."
That is complete nonsense.
In fact, transgender female to males are at higher risk for cancer, if they forego regular screening.
This nonsense is bad enough as to be life threatening, in fact.
The risk of cancer depends on the person's basic biological reality and has nothing to do with how they identify.
I can cite HUNDREDS of scientific papers to support my claim.
Let's start off with a few ...
Yes, but evidence doesn't matter. Only feelings matter.
Braun, Hayley, et al. "Cancer in transgender people: evidence and methodological considerations." Epidemiologic reviews 39.1 (2017): 93-107.
"As cross-sex hormones administered for the purposes of gender affirmation may be delivered at high doses and over a period of decades, the carcinogenicity of hormonal therapy in transgender people is an area of considerable concern. In addition, concerns about cancer risk in transgender patients have been linked to sexually transmitted infections, increased exposure to well-known risk factors such as smoking and alcohol use, and the lack of adequate access to screening."
๐บ
Stop.
Delet.
no
I like to spam studies.
Facts trigger me.
I can think of several dozens of areas of research that completely contradict this letter.
The studies they cite link to WPATH, which is more of an activist organization, and link to a study that says that it reduces gender disphoria. They forget to link to the studies that show that suicidal risk is no significantly reduced and there is a sizable portion of individuals that regret transitioning.