Mine pinged everyone, not everyone.

Though I do have a tendency to ping people when I try to talk with them specifically.

XD yeah it gets confusing when its litterally the same spelling

Good times.

yeah is common 😛

pingin someone specifically is okay, i think

i mean... you ARE trying to talk to that person

Precisely.

I use pings based on how active the chat is because with a bunch of people talking about a multitude of topics it's impossible to chat without pinging and letting that person know what is said

Hello

STFU COMMUNIST

Get BTFO'd

What's up doc

What the fuck

Did you just bugs bunny me

I can't think of a bugs bunny reply to that

ROOTIN TOOTIN VARMIN'

Maybe i did, maybe i dinnt

is a bug bunny reply

Shit

U rite

This looks promising https://twitter.com/CHSommers/status/1062192506341707776?s=19

Ideally we wouldn't need pseudonyms

But that sounds like fun

SJWs getting triggered over languages like Spanish and French which are based on masculine/feminine.

It's funny how people are proud of science for how it was once blasphemy and they proved the masses wrong, only to now mock others for not being apart of the masses

I believe all ideas should be out there since we should only believe what we can prove or best others in debate

For example, SJWs banning speech of their opposition is weak minded. If they were right they should have no problems debating

science is considered blasphemy right now. there would not be a need for pseudonyms otherwise.

Depends on who is considering

There is also a monopoly on what is considered fact much like back in the middle ages

I mean, we've un-facetiously returned back to witch hunts/burnings.

I suppose so

i mean... i watched a debate a few weeks ago where someone unironically called for book burning (of a specific author)

Also funny how conspiracy theorist is thrown around, but then mainstream left and right becomes literal conspiracy theorists over Russia and shit

that's sad

Like wait weren't our greatest truths born from conspiracy?

Nazis hiding evidence and changing numbers: conspiracy

well, we haven't proved 9/11 was an inside job just yet

but we're close

Well, it's proven to some