Message from @Dusty Morgan

Discord ID: 519327359904645121


2018-12-04 01:34:59 UTC  

That way it tends to protect the social giants and freedom of speech.

2018-12-04 01:35:05 UTC  

Both win.

2018-12-04 01:35:10 UTC  

Authoritarians lose.

2018-12-04 01:35:49 UTC  

@Dusty Morgan I agree. But we need to get them to quit censoring.

2018-12-04 01:36:03 UTC  

Add it to the amendment.

2018-12-04 01:36:32 UTC  

@Schedrevka only jk rowling would do the smallest brain

2018-12-04 01:36:32 UTC  

Specifically the first amendment.

2018-12-04 01:37:01 UTC  

Good luck with that. I vote that after Google, Reddit, et al. decided to push Net Neutrality on the telecoms, we should push net neutrality on them.

2018-12-04 01:37:08 UTC  

Huh... Metal Gear...

2018-12-04 01:37:16 UTC  

Krazz its a meme

2018-12-04 01:37:19 UTC  

<:NPC:500042527231967262>

2018-12-04 01:37:32 UTC  

The principle of "Eye for a eye leaves everyone blind." applies here.

2018-12-04 01:37:37 UTC  

Everyone will end up suffering in the end.

2018-12-04 01:37:39 UTC  

**NANOMACHINES, SON.**

2018-12-04 01:38:55 UTC  

I think the only absolute amendments should be to stop governments from finding new ways to lord over us with absolute power and deny us our rights afforded to us by our founding fathers.

2018-12-04 01:39:31 UTC  

This type of amendment should be stone, can't be altered or changed, only added onto by the will of the people.

2018-12-04 01:40:04 UTC  

I would call this "Absolute Amendments and Bill of Rights"

2018-12-04 01:40:11 UTC  

You're not passing a constitutional amendment unless it's near unanimous with everyone.

2018-12-04 01:40:36 UTC  

My goal would be find amendments that is for the benefit of all citizens, not the government or corporate entities. Protects the rights of the citizens and their liberty to use those rights.

2018-12-04 01:41:18 UTC  

Sure. But it's *really, really* hard to pass a constitutional amendment.

2018-12-04 01:41:31 UTC  

I know it is hard... that is why it is great.

2018-12-04 01:41:48 UTC  

Make it extremely hard, so it is frustrating for the government to alter the amendment manipulatively.

2018-12-04 01:42:02 UTC  

And you know it would suffer overreach, particularly if it's a positive right.

2018-12-04 01:42:34 UTC  

Then we must take a steady and slow approach to any new amendment article.

2018-12-04 01:42:47 UTC  

Cover all basis and make sure no loopholes are in it.

2018-12-04 01:42:49 UTC  

Rushing is bad.

2018-12-04 01:43:20 UTC  

I think in time-span, the founding fathers took YEARS to draft up the constitution and bill of rights.

2018-12-04 01:43:52 UTC  

So many debates, talks, rough drafts, and going back to the drawing board.

2018-12-04 01:44:16 UTC  

I think in all honesty, what we lack is patience and wisdom today.

2018-12-04 01:44:36 UTC  

We tend to rush things through and forget the unintended consequences.

2018-12-04 01:45:19 UTC  

I think you're way under-thinking this.

2018-12-04 01:45:40 UTC  

In all honesty, it is something I been thinking about for years.

2018-12-04 01:45:55 UTC  

The founding father's amendments are actually very well written.

2018-12-04 01:46:10 UTC  

I think things are too bad, and we should make things more good. Why has no one done this yet?

2018-12-04 01:46:10 UTC  

Only thing is... they really haven't been able to predict the future.

2018-12-04 01:46:12 UTC  

That is it.

2018-12-04 01:46:39 UTC  

but in their defense who can

2018-12-04 01:47:03 UTC  

While the new amendments added after the founding fathers in the 1800 and up were RUSHED, leaving loopholes for exploitation and use by government or foreign individuals.

2018-12-04 01:47:16 UTC  

That is true... Aperture... that is why I can't blame them for that.

2018-12-04 01:47:25 UTC  

I absolutely admire our founding fathers.