Message from @SantaSoc
Discord ID: 519326290692669461
Predicts eu fucks being pricks
<:commie:463087263153258506>
It was written in 1949
So it basically it is a prediction of what will happen to EU.
And apparently this predict is spot on.
Yep
@pratel Im suggesting to my parents that they pressure the service to fix the issue as its their responsibility ultimately
but idk if its the printer itself or their network
If you are providing a platform for people to speak, I think the social media giants shouldn't be held accountable for what random people say.
if its the printer then we have no choice but to fix it ourselves
Smallest Brain: Comparing politics to Harry Potter
Small Brain: Comparing politics to 1984 and Farenheit 451
Giant Brain: Comparing politics to Deus Ex and MGS2
That way it tends to protect the social giants and freedom of speech.
Both win.
Authoritarians lose.
@Dusty Morgan I agree. But we need to get them to quit censoring.
Add it to the amendment.
@Schedrevka only jk rowling would do the smallest brain
Specifically the first amendment.
Good luck with that. I vote that after Google, Reddit, et al. decided to push Net Neutrality on the telecoms, we should push net neutrality on them.
Huh... Metal Gear...
<:NPC:500042527231967262>
The principle of "Eye for a eye leaves everyone blind." applies here.
Everyone will end up suffering in the end.
**NANOMACHINES, SON.**
I think the only absolute amendments should be to stop governments from finding new ways to lord over us with absolute power and deny us our rights afforded to us by our founding fathers.
This type of amendment should be stone, can't be altered or changed, only added onto by the will of the people.
I would call this "Absolute Amendments and Bill of Rights"
You're not passing a constitutional amendment unless it's near unanimous with everyone.
My goal would be find amendments that is for the benefit of all citizens, not the government or corporate entities. Protects the rights of the citizens and their liberty to use those rights.
Sure. But it's *really, really* hard to pass a constitutional amendment.
I know it is hard... that is why it is great.
Make it extremely hard, so it is frustrating for the government to alter the amendment manipulatively.
And you know it would suffer overreach, particularly if it's a positive right.
Then we must take a steady and slow approach to any new amendment article.
Cover all basis and make sure no loopholes are in it.
Rushing is bad.
I think in time-span, the founding fathers took YEARS to draft up the constitution and bill of rights.
So many debates, talks, rough drafts, and going back to the drawing board.
I think in all honesty, what we lack is patience and wisdom today.