Message from @SantaSoc

Discord ID: 519326290692669461


2018-12-04 01:33:20 UTC  

Predicts eu fucks being pricks

2018-12-04 01:33:22 UTC  

<:commie:463087263153258506>

2018-12-04 01:33:25 UTC  

It was written in 1949

2018-12-04 01:33:54 UTC  

So it basically it is a prediction of what will happen to EU.

2018-12-04 01:34:01 UTC  

And apparently this predict is spot on.

2018-12-04 01:34:02 UTC  

Yep

2018-12-04 01:34:07 UTC  

@pratel Im suggesting to my parents that they pressure the service to fix the issue as its their responsibility ultimately

2018-12-04 01:34:34 UTC  

but idk if its the printer itself or their network

2018-12-04 01:34:49 UTC  

If you are providing a platform for people to speak, I think the social media giants shouldn't be held accountable for what random people say.

2018-12-04 01:34:51 UTC  

if its the printer then we have no choice but to fix it ourselves

2018-12-04 01:34:51 UTC  

Smallest Brain: Comparing politics to Harry Potter
Small Brain: Comparing politics to 1984 and Farenheit 451
Giant Brain: Comparing politics to Deus Ex and MGS2

2018-12-04 01:34:59 UTC  

That way it tends to protect the social giants and freedom of speech.

2018-12-04 01:35:05 UTC  

Both win.

2018-12-04 01:35:10 UTC  

Authoritarians lose.

2018-12-04 01:35:49 UTC  

@Dusty Morgan I agree. But we need to get them to quit censoring.

2018-12-04 01:36:03 UTC  

Add it to the amendment.

2018-12-04 01:36:32 UTC  

@Schedrevka only jk rowling would do the smallest brain

2018-12-04 01:36:32 UTC  

Specifically the first amendment.

2018-12-04 01:37:01 UTC  

Good luck with that. I vote that after Google, Reddit, et al. decided to push Net Neutrality on the telecoms, we should push net neutrality on them.

2018-12-04 01:37:08 UTC  

Huh... Metal Gear...

2018-12-04 01:37:16 UTC  

Krazz its a meme

2018-12-04 01:37:19 UTC  

<:NPC:500042527231967262>

2018-12-04 01:37:32 UTC  

The principle of "Eye for a eye leaves everyone blind." applies here.

2018-12-04 01:37:37 UTC  

Everyone will end up suffering in the end.

2018-12-04 01:37:39 UTC  

**NANOMACHINES, SON.**

2018-12-04 01:38:55 UTC  

I think the only absolute amendments should be to stop governments from finding new ways to lord over us with absolute power and deny us our rights afforded to us by our founding fathers.

2018-12-04 01:39:31 UTC  

This type of amendment should be stone, can't be altered or changed, only added onto by the will of the people.

2018-12-04 01:40:04 UTC  

I would call this "Absolute Amendments and Bill of Rights"

2018-12-04 01:40:11 UTC  

You're not passing a constitutional amendment unless it's near unanimous with everyone.

2018-12-04 01:40:36 UTC  

My goal would be find amendments that is for the benefit of all citizens, not the government or corporate entities. Protects the rights of the citizens and their liberty to use those rights.

2018-12-04 01:41:18 UTC  

Sure. But it's *really, really* hard to pass a constitutional amendment.

2018-12-04 01:41:31 UTC  

I know it is hard... that is why it is great.

2018-12-04 01:41:48 UTC  

Make it extremely hard, so it is frustrating for the government to alter the amendment manipulatively.

2018-12-04 01:42:02 UTC  

And you know it would suffer overreach, particularly if it's a positive right.

2018-12-04 01:42:34 UTC  

Then we must take a steady and slow approach to any new amendment article.

2018-12-04 01:42:47 UTC  

Cover all basis and make sure no loopholes are in it.

2018-12-04 01:42:49 UTC  

Rushing is bad.

2018-12-04 01:43:20 UTC  

I think in time-span, the founding fathers took YEARS to draft up the constitution and bill of rights.

2018-12-04 01:43:52 UTC  

So many debates, talks, rough drafts, and going back to the drawing board.

2018-12-04 01:44:16 UTC  

I think in all honesty, what we lack is patience and wisdom today.