Guess I need to buy the book.

Or smth

Unless we can get the service to get off their asses and fix it themselves

Orwell died in the 1950 lol

O lul

Epic

Predicts eu fucks being pricks

<:commie:463087263153258506>

It was written in 1949

So it basically it is a prediction of what will happen to EU.

And apparently this predict is spot on.

Yep

@pratel Im suggesting to my parents that they pressure the service to fix the issue as its their responsibility ultimately

but idk if its the printer itself or their network

If you are providing a platform for people to speak, I think the social media giants shouldn't be held accountable for what random people say.

if its the printer then we have no choice but to fix it ourselves

Smallest Brain: Comparing politics to Harry Potter
Small Brain: Comparing politics to 1984 and Farenheit 451
Giant Brain: Comparing politics to Deus Ex and MGS2

That way it tends to protect the social giants and freedom of speech.

Both win.

Authoritarians lose.

@Dusty Morgan I agree. But we need to get them to quit censoring.

Add it to the amendment.

@Schedrevka only jk rowling would do the smallest brain

Specifically the first amendment.

Good luck with that. I vote that after Google, Reddit, et al. decided to push Net Neutrality on the telecoms, we should push net neutrality on them.

Huh... Metal Gear...

Krazz its a meme

<:NPC:500042527231967262>

The principle of "Eye for a eye leaves everyone blind." applies here.

Everyone will end up suffering in the end.

**NANOMACHINES, SON.**

I think the only absolute amendments should be to stop governments from finding new ways to lord over us with absolute power and deny us our rights afforded to us by our founding fathers.

This type of amendment should be stone, can't be altered or changed, only added onto by the will of the people.

I would call this "Absolute Amendments and Bill of Rights"

You're not passing a constitutional amendment unless it's near unanimous with everyone.

My goal would be find amendments that is for the benefit of all citizens, not the government or corporate entities. Protects the rights of the citizens and their liberty to use those rights.

Sure. But it's *really, really* hard to pass a constitutional amendment.

I know it is hard... that is why it is great.

Make it extremely hard, so it is frustrating for the government to alter the amendment manipulatively.

And you know it would suffer overreach, particularly if it's a positive right.

Then we must take a steady and slow approach to any new amendment article.