well they will not change that but someone else

they cannot do stuff like this anymore

cus things will be escalating

I overslept by an hour

But I suffer like I overslept by a day

I'd punch my body for doing this stuff, but it would hurt me more than it would hurt my body

Yakyakyakyakyakakakakakkekekekekekekekekekekekekekekek3k lols https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-europe-45269764

Hay check it out I've got an avatar to work with for videos now

@tomee_bear on twitter if anyone's wondering

@AnthonyLaCosaNostra irony xD sweet sweet irony 😄

of course google knows what porn i watched. Dont know why that would be news.

And i dont mind

Dont need to fear shame if you are shameless

ehhh

it's more a matter of privacy and the threat of using that information against you.

Regardless, kinkshaming is wrong. Unless their fetish is humiliation, then these perverts need to be shamed.

You can be shameless, but if the law changes in the future and some kinds of porn are illegalized?

wouldnt suddenly make my past illegal

no law applies before its ratified/signed/whatever

Re Kevin Hart being ejected from the Oscars for homophobic tweets... from 10 years ago.

granted that's not a matter of law.

but honestly at this point an outrage mob is all it takes

i guess so

but i dont have a job they could get me fired from

and i kept it that way for a reason

indeed, i dont see myself tied to this nation or the west in general

I'm a bit more tied, but it's less my job than it is my treasury of the basic ideals of america

honestly, I REALLY want to see an internet bill of rights

or something that will allow companies based in america to not censor america automatically

I don't mind people building censorship filter options into their services, but no information should be eradicated or disbarred

hell, that whole thing with the bomber who was on gab?

they found him by backtracking gab

that information was useful

I can understand the sentiment behind desires to censor stuff, but that's unamerican. IMHO, giving INDIVIDUALs control over what they view is an infinitely better option than allowing a corporate autocracy to do it.

I never trust faceless organizations, and it's pretty plain that they're in a cartel at this point.

woo

But these companies have a fiduciary duty to thier shareholders to care about PR. The last thing they can afford based on that duty is to be associated with someone who carries out a terror attack, especially if any element of it including thier diatribes were performed using thier venue.

The shareholders xd

Unless you want a government sponsored venue, any private mass venue will have this challenge.

Yeah, like the people who collectively own the company. :P

People who want to make a return on thier investment.