@Misomania True. The Elites are fucking ruthless, they don't want anyone else but them to succeed.

well its only natural

They don't want to share the youtube platform that they didn't create.

everyone wants to win

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC7J1VJp5dY

watch now

or else

the libtards win

I wouldn't mind celebrities who start from scratch, working their way up the chain like other youtubers.

@Misomania Not to mention one side comming together other side seems to eat its own

That wouldn't bother me as much. Instead of Celebrites who use their production value team to make them look better.

Pewdiepie is ok but he can't compete against a potential billion hindus wanting to hear bollywood songs

I don't think anything's gonna beat Rewind 2018 in quite some time

or whatever it is tseries promotes

I mean think of it... if a Celebrity created his own animation, his own scripts, his own work on a youtube channel. Then yeah I would support him. He would have made it regardless of his celebrity status because he gots talent and skill.

its a hoax, T-series is propped up falsely

He didn't have anyone else create shit.

just look at the viewcount on their videos

I would support that celebrity. Would you guys too?

they get less in 10 hours what PewDiePie gets in 1 hour

I wonder if they have any street shitting videos

He is competing on a level playing field with the other youtubers.

Can't really do something about name recognition. So I can't fault them for that.

i'd support any creator im interested in, provided its interesting 😛

But if they play on a level playing field, I would support that celebrity.

no thot gaming channels tho 😛

why support thot channels? they put up sexy pics for free yo

thats why i dont

they also just ruin the normal stuff

if i want wamen, i'll go watch porn, or blitzcrieg my gf

latter is prio ofc 😛

lmao

blitzcrieg your gf

so romantic

@Timcast well rico is precisly for situations where no illegal act has been proven. With the SPLC, conspiracy to crimes could indeed be applicable. I dont think either will stick but conspiracy doesnt crequire any explicit agreement, an implicit agreement is enough. A conspirator can be held legaly responsible for any crimes commited by a co-conspirator so long as the act falls in the scope of the conspiracy or is a forseeable consequence of it. Say, people physicly attack people based on SPLC information. This would of course require prove of mens rea which is very hard to impossible.

:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>

:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Subscribestar (exclusive Discord rewards available):
<https://www.subscribestar.com/Timcastt>

And RICO, yeah, the don may not have told people to kill a person, just that the person is a problem to be solved...

I dont think either will stick but its within the types ofthings where it would be applicable.

Though i would argue that this may simply be a wakeup call about the fact that RICO may be a bad idea.

But then i make no qualms about the fact that i will oppose the "rebuilding" of society should it ever break apart