what I said is that he got out of the van to check on people and got attacked by a mob. kicked in the face etc.

𝗧𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘀Today at 11:20
that guy was innocent. the only person that died collapsed in the middle of the road in the dark with a heart attack 10 minutes before the van arrived

you said he was innocent

I explained what I said fully. that I think it was a drunk driving accident.

This argument is pretty gay

theres no need to take things out of context to claim I said he never ran anyone over. that's dishonest.

and the notes?

and the things he said in court?

and the confession?

quotes from the BBC.

LOL

no they are from the court

BBC would never lie right?

Why

do you know what happens when a reporter lies about the things that are said in court?

Cow please stop

What if terrorist arent the problem, but islam is

It's too early

I found the video anyway. That's primary evidence of what I said.

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=21b_1497910217

So they're kicking the shit outta someone who tried to kill em

ok

what a shock

im like 2mins in, wheres the part that proves him innocent?

Restraining the attacker

if he just wanted to kill them, he wouldnt of stopped and got out though would he, he would of drove off.

But he was drunk

he was yeah

howdy peeps

which makes me think it was an accident, guy was an alcoholic

Hi

"No your honor I did kill that man and I hated his guts but I was drunk so it's ok"

so why would he talk about killing politicians in court n shit?

he could've regretted it or wanted to admire his handy work

who is not guilty/totes guilty for what?

according to the BBC.

no

not just the bbc

and every other left wing publication

lol