Message from @TheBoat
Discord ID: 303827369720938496
Ancap you pay to get people do do things, no force
>Can't shoot, you signed a contract
Don't sign shitty contract which would make you a serf
Pay in taxes to a regional protector who will kill threats to you
make the contract better then
Essentially a monarch
Rights as in use of force is a no go
Yeah, it's voluntary
>taxes regional protector
Dude PMCs
Competition
PMCs have a leader
PMCs are not monarchies
Leader calls himself the king, requires you to in exchange for protection
It all eventually leads to Monarchy
Multiple PMCs could exist in a region, and should for most efficiency
PMCs go to war with eachotheer
War of The Roses
Naw fam not if people are educated and desire to preserve ancap society
Houses of York and Lancashire
England is not ancap
I know
They had aristocracy
king != monarch
A modern ancap society would consist of people who believe in the system, they wouldn't let a state form like that
monarch is a governmental position king is just a title
@TheBoat I do get your point, and I think that is how originally governments formed. The world was full anarchy though not ancap
In ancap initiating the use of force is wrong
I understand that, but I can't fully see how AnCap can survive. It isn't really society and who is to dictate what is and is not force.
Force is causing someone to act against their will
But that's up for loose interprerwtion
Interpretation**
Will being, outside of a contract which they willingly agreed to
How so?
You can't force someone to interpret force in a certain way
Say hypothetically okay
This is all hypothetical
So what if you walk down the street
Normal day, you bump into someone bc you weren't paying attention
inb4 muh roads