Monarchy came out of societies with no founded states

>if he violates your rights you shoot him

Kings can do whatever the fuck they want

No rights with no state

Ancap you pay to get people do do things, no force

>Can't shoot, you signed a contract

Don't sign shitty contract which would make you a serf

Pay in taxes to a regional protector who will kill threats to you

make the contract better then

Essentially a monarch

Rights as in use of force is a no go

Yeah, it's voluntary

>taxes regional protector

Dude PMCs

Competition

PMCs have a leader

PMCs are not monarchies

Leader calls himself the king, requires you to in exchange for protection

It all eventually leads to Monarchy

Multiple PMCs could exist in a region, and should for most efficiency

PMCs go to war with eachotheer

War of The Roses

Naw fam not if people are educated and desire to preserve ancap society

Houses of York and Lancashire

Who educates

England is not ancap

I know

They had aristocracy

king != monarch

A modern ancap society would consist of people who believe in the system, they wouldn't let a state form like that

monarch is a governmental position king is just a title

@TheBoat I do get your point, and I think that is how originally governments formed. The world was full anarchy though not ancap

In ancap initiating the use of force is wrong

I understand that, but I can't fully see how AnCap can survive. It isn't really society and who is to dictate what is and is not force.

Force is causing someone to act against their will

But that's up for loose interprerwtion

Interpretation**

Will being, outside of a contract which they willingly agreed to

How so?

You can't force someone to interpret force in a certain way

Say hypothetically okay