Message from @Chief Rocket Designer
Discord ID: 655159177282322479
You'd have to prove the moon landing in the first place
It already has been proven
it would have been harder to fake the moon landing to actually get to the moon
Just making excuses when there are actual facts of what happened to this day and you just ignore it for what? To hold on to your ball earth. Shitz redic.
😂
@l.caudri Prove it
That’s why it’s exposed, they couldn’t fake it well enough
[21:23] l.caudri: it would have been harder to fake the moon landing to actually get to the moon--lololol ffs that is so ridiculous
Modern day orbiters, like the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, has taken pictures of the Apollo 11 landing site and it is still relatively undisturbed
the computational power in the 60's to replicate the footage would of been basically impossible with the computers used then
Also it should be known that they left lasers on the Moon too so that is also evidence towards it being true
😂
Mirrors*
Imagine thinking you can make something like 2001: Space Odyssey but can't make something like the moon landing
It would have been extremely simple
You are willfully ignorant so how they overcame the speed differential, Van Allen Belt, Fuel creation, Vacuum implosion etc?
to recreate the lighting and all the shadows, you would of needed millions of lasers which were incredibly expensive at the time, as well as the majority of lasers came in red. It was easier just to actually get to the moon than faking everyting with CGI (as cgi wasnt as powerfull enough like it is today)
Dude
@Sassy Undeniably they are not showing the actual footage of them faking anything at all. Just a narrated hit peice, I would want the raw footage uncut unnarrated
```speed differential, Van Allen Belt, Fuel creation, Vacuum implosion``` They did not go throught the Van Allen belts directly they went through the outer edges of them idk what is hard to think with the fuel creation Kerosene and LOX are easy to make. Vacuum implosion im sorry what, and Speed Differential what does that even mean
I've seen this argument a lot but it makes no sense because they did it easily in the movie with lighting
looks pretty sh-t to me
🤡
"Dude the lighting wouldn't have worked" gtfo
people literally saw the rocket leave as well <:rocket:625748844998688768>
it wouldn't have
but ok
It must be hard being passionate about rockets all your life to admitting it’s all fake
That doesn't matter either
Rockets are not fake you dumb idiot
Space rockets are
They are the same thing
You can't argue that because we saw the rocket lift off and disappear somewhere that it had to go to space
I was decent with physics
@Sassy Undeniably do you have ANY raw footage?
clearly not if you believe the moon landing was faked and that earth is flat
I have yet to see a good argument yet